Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 187049
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:45:17+00:00 2026-05-11T15:45:17+00:00

Autoboxing seems to come down to the fact that I can write: Integer i

  • 0

Autoboxing seems to come down to the fact that I can write:

Integer i = 0;  

instead of:

Integer i = new Integer(0); 

So, the compiler can automatically convert a primitive to an Object.

Is that the idea? Why is this important?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:45:18+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:45 pm

    You kind of simplified it a little too much.

    Autoboxing also comes into play when using collections. As explained in sun’s java docs:

    Collections can only hold object references, so you have to box primitive values into the appropriate wrapper class. … When you take the object out of the collection, you get the Integer that you put in; if you need an int, you must unbox the Integer using the intValue method. All of this boxing and unboxing is a pain, and clutters up your code. The autoboxing and unboxing feature automates the process, eliminating the pain and the clutter.

    So when should you use autoboxing and unboxing? Use them only when there is an “impedance mismatch” between reference types and primitives, for example, when you have to put numerical values into a collection. It is not appropriate to use autoboxing and unboxing for scientific computing, or other performance-sensitive numerical code. An Integer is not a substitute for an int; autoboxing and unboxing blur the distinction between primitive types and reference types, but they do not eliminate it.

    Great overview of Autoboxing

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there anything that java cannot do? But other's can? I am talking about
Possible Duplicate: Tricky ternary operator in Java - autoboxing We know that int roomCode
From the answer to a question about primitive types and autoboxing in java :
I want to convert a primitive to a string, and I tried: myInt.toString(); This
I noticed today that auto-boxing can sometimes cause ambiguity in method overload resolution. The
It seems to me that PrintStream.print(Object x) and PrintStream.println(Object x) are identical to PrintStream.print(String
As of Java 1.5, you can pretty much interchange Integer with int in many
I write a jni function to set the value of two java Integer object
With autounboxing, this statement will automatically work: int myPrimitive = (Integer) doIt(); But if
Autoboxing is rather scary. While I fully understand the difference between == and .equals

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.