Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8009297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T18:24:19+00:00 2026-06-04T18:24:19+00:00

B::Lint doesn’t like while (<>) {do stuff} , docs show nasty injection attack due

  • 0

B::Lint doesn’t like while (<>) {do stuff}, docs show nasty injection attack due to its internal use of the evil 2 argument open. Is there an easy way to make this usage safer? I have a lot of minor scripts that use this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T18:24:21+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 6:24 pm

    You can use ARGV::readonly. It will allow for safer usage of the diamond operator.

    ARGV::readonly – make <> open files regardless of leading/trailing whitespace and/or control characters such as |, >, amd <.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When I pass this through a JSON lint it doesn't appear as a nested
I'd like to use JSLint , but I am wary of tools that have
jruby-lint reports the use of Timeout::timeout as a potential source of problems: ./app/models/xyz.rb:273: [timeout,
I have the following pre-commit hook to use JavaScript Lint for checking JavaScript files
I want to use jQuery Lint to check for possible jQuery errors. I wanted
Is there a lint-like tool for C#? I've got the compiler to flag warnings-as-errors,
I get a lint warning when I include an icon which doesn't have versions
Lint Error Checking tool that comes with Android Developer Tools has an optional setting
If I run lint . inside project directory I get the expected warnings, but
Can GHC or some lint tool tell me when I've provided a type signature

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.