Home/ Questions/Q 3594922
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-18T19:46:58+00:00

Both GCC and Clang do not complain if I assign a string literal to

  • 0

Both GCC and Clang do not complain if I assign a string literal to a char*, even when using lots of pedantic options (-Wall -W -pedantic -std=c99):

char *foo = "bar";

while they (of course) do complain if I assign a const char* to a char*.

Does this mean that string literals are considered to be of char* type? Shouldn’t they be const char*? It’s not defined behavior if they get modified!

And (an uncorrelated question) what about command line parameters (ie: argv): is it considered to be an array of string literals?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    They are of type char[N] where N is the number of characters including the terminating \0. So yes you can assign them to char*, but you still cannot write to them (the effect will be undefined).

    Wrt argv: It points to an array of pointers to strings. Those strings are explicitly modifiable. You can change them and they are required to hold the last stored value.

    • 0