Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 463987
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T23:13:48+00:00 2026-05-12T23:13:48+00:00

C++ continues to surprise me. Today i found out about the ->* operator. It

  • 0

C++ continues to surprise me.
Today i found out about the ->* operator. It is overloadable but i have no idea how to invoke it. I manage to overload it in my class but i have no clue how to call it.

struct B { int a; };

struct A
{
    typedef int (A::*a_func)(void);
    B *p;
    int a,b,c;
    A() { a=0; }
    A(int bb) { b=b; c=b; }
    int operator + (int a) { return 2; }
    int operator ->* (a_func a) { return 99; }
    int operator ->* (int a) { return 94; }
    int operator * (int a) { return 2; }
    B* operator -> () { return p; }


    int ff() { return 4; }
};


void main()
{
    A a;
    A*p = &a;
    a + 2;
}

edit:

Thanks to the answer. To call the overloaded function i write

void main()
{
    A a;
    A*p = &a;
    a + 2;
    a->a;
    A::a_func f = &A::ff;
    (&a->*f)();
    (a->*f); //this
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T23:13:48+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:13 pm

    The overloaded ->* operator is a binary operator (while .* is not overloadable). It is interpreted as an ordinary binary operator, so in you original case in order to call that operator you have to do something like

    A a;
    B* p = a->*2; // calls A::operator->*(int)
    

    What you read in the Piotr’s answer applies to the built-in operators, not to your overloaded one. What you call in your added example is also the built-in operator, not your overloaded one. In order to call the overloaded operator you have to do what I do in my example above.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been learning Rails but routes continues to confuse the heck out of me.
I cannot figure out why my code continues to run even though it appears
I have a service that continues to do what the activity was doing when
this post ideally continues my other post on MEF plugins, but my first post
I can't figure out why xcode continues to throw this error *** Terminating app
I have a script that processes user input and before it continues with database
I have a table with many records and it continues to grow: table T_A
Lets say we have release branch called v1.0. The work in trunk continues (developing
I have a process, which creates a dynamic list of timers(System.Threading.Timer) and continues to
I have a HashTable like HashTable<String, String> table=new HashTable<String, String>(); table.put(1,ABC); .......continues Now with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.