Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 205335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:32:50+00:00 2026-05-11T17:32:50+00:00

Can 2 or more equations defining a function in Haskell share the same where

  • 0

Can 2 or more equations defining a function in Haskell share the same where / let block?

Let me present a contrived example to illustrate the question.

First, consider the following code as a starting point:

someFunction v1 v2 v3 = difference ^ v3
   where
      difference = v1 - v2

So far, so good. But then, imagine I need to deal with an “alternative case”, where I need to return zero if v3 == 99 and difference < 4 (completely arbitrary, but let’s say those are my requirements).

My first thought would be to do this:

someFunction v1 v2 99 | difference < 4 = 0
someFunction v1 v2 v3 = difference ^ v3
   where
      difference = v1 - v2

However, that won’t work because the first equation for someFunction and the second equation for someFunction are not both sharing the same where block. This is not a big deal in this contrived example because there is only one variable in the where block (“difference”). But in a real world situation, there could be a large number of variables, and it would be unacceptable to repeat them.

I already know how to solve this by using guards and having only one equation. The question is, is there a way for multiple equations to share the same where / let clause? Because it seems desirable to have multiple equations with different patterns instead of being forced to have just one equation with many guards.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:32:50+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    One option would be to lift the function into the where block itself:

    someFunction v1 v2 = f
        where
            f 99 | difference < 4 = 0
            f v3 = difference ^ v3
            difference = v1 - v2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 216k
  • Answers 216k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What you are trying to do is supported in .NET… May 12, 2026 at 11:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you only have one row with the class hightlight… May 12, 2026 at 11:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer $last = array_pop(explode('\\', $str)); You don't need foreach for that.… May 12, 2026 at 11:05 pm

Related Questions

I've tried the typical physics equations for this but none of them really work
(In the context of .NET for what its worth) I tend to not use
I'm aware of the Ruby word array: a = %w( stackoverflow serverfault superuser) How
I currently have a Python set of n size where n >= 0. Is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.