Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8873573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T18:29:59+00:00 2026-06-14T18:29:59+00:00

catch in Ruby is meant to jump out of deeply nested code. In Java

  • 0

catch in Ruby is meant to jump out of deeply nested code. In Java e.g. it is possible to achieve the same with Java’s try-catch meant for handling exceptions, it is however considered poor solution and is also very inefficient. In Ruby for handling exceptions we have begin-raise-rescue and I assume it is also to expensive to use it for other tasks.

Is Ruby’s catch-throw really a more efficient solution then begin-raise-rescue or are there any other reasons to use it to break nested blocks instead of begin-raise-rescue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T18:30:00+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:30 pm

    In addition to being the “correct” way to get out of control structures, catch-throw is also significantly faster(10 times as fast in my testing). Check out this gist for my code and results.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to catch two exceptions because they require the same handling logic. I
Is possible to catch more then one exception in the same catch block? try
Possible Duplicate: Javascript Try-Catch Performance Vs. Error Checking Code A colleague of mine told
Code: catch (IOException e) { LOGGER.error(IOException exception happened); //now need throw again the same
Why can't I catch this exception? My (client) code: Eigen::MatrixXd FFs ; try {
In ruby, begin # ... rescue # ... end won't catch exceptions that aren't
Is it possible to catch all grous of same digits in string with regex
Ruby has two different exceptions mechanisms: Throw/Catch and Raise/Rescue. Why do we have two?
Is there a library or easy way to catch exceptions thrown in a Ruby
I am looking for a ruby code quality checker that could catch or notify

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.