Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8862377
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T15:42:50+00:00 2026-06-14T15:42:50+00:00

Coming from MFC, I treated qDebug() much like TRACE() , assuming that it is

  • 0

Coming from MFC, I treated qDebug() much like TRACE(), assuming that it is removed from Release builds by the preprocessor (in MFC it’s done using #define TRACE 1 ? (void*) 0 : AfxTrace).

To my surprise, however, qDebug() is executed in Release builds as well. How do I change this? And also, why is this so, what was the reasoning of the developers of Qt behind this decision?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T15:42:52+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 3:42 pm

    qDebug is also preprocessor-controlled, but it has its own special macro, QT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT. If you add that to your Release build defines, it will be removed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Coming from a Java background, I understand that __str__ is something like a Python
Coming from a PHP background, I'm used to writing small functions that return a
Coming from C++ it is hard grained into my mind that everytime I call
Coming from a javascript background, collections like dictionaries are often implemented as objects because
Coming from frameworks like Django and RoR I am used to show and handle
Coming from C#, where class instances are passed by reference (that is, a copy
coming from php and Mysql i know how its best done in php but
Coming from Haskell I was used to have concise operators like not (x `elem`
Coming from Java I really like the flexibility afforded by the rich collection of
Coming from CodeIgniter, I'd like to learn Laravel. But I'm breaking my head 2

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.