Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3790272
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T12:17:20+00:00 2026-05-19T12:17:20+00:00

Consider the following: a=[0,1] #our starting value a=[a,1] #=> [[0,1],1] as expected I would

  • 0

Consider the following:

a=[0,1] #our starting value
a=[a,1] #=> [[0,1],1] as expected

I would anticipate the following to have the same result:

a=[0,1] #same starting place
a[0]=a  #should make a the same thing as it was above, right?
a       #=> [[...],1]   !!!

In the first example, the second assignment refers to the value of a before the assignment was made. In the second example, the second assignment performs a recursive assignment. This feels like different behavior to me. Is this behavior in fact consistent? If so can someone please explain why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T12:17:21+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 12:17 pm

    In the first example you are creating a new array with the value [[0,1], 1]. Then you are reassigning a to refer to this array.

    In the second example you are not creating a new array, nor are you changing what a refers to. You are changing the existing array to contain a reference to itself. That’s very different.


    More details

    The first example is roughly equivalent to this code:

    a = [0, 1]  # Step 1
    b = [a, 1]  # Step 2
    a = b       # Step 3
    

    In pictures it looks like this:

    • Step 1 – create an array:
    ---
    |a|
    ---
     |
     v
     [0, 1]
    
    • Step 2 – create another array which includes a reference to the first:
        ---        ---
        |a|        |b| 
        ---        ---
         |          |
         |          v
         |          [ref, 1]
         |            |
         +------------+
         v 
         [0, 1]      
    
    • Step 3 – change a to point to the array created in step 2:
        ---        ---
        |a|        |b| 
        ---        ---
         |          |
         +----------+
                    v
                    [ref, 1]
                      |
        +-------------+
        v 
        [0, 1]      
    

    On the other hand, the code in the second example gives you this:

        ---
        |a|
        ---
         |
     +---+
     |   v
     |   [ref, 1]
     |     |
     +-----+
    

    Here there is still only one array, and a still points to it. But now the first element in the array refers to the array itself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider following scenario: I have RESTful URL /articles that returns list of articles user
Let's consider following, simplified example: We have 2 tabs withing <rich:tabPanel switchType=ajax> , each
I have the following problem: Let's consider we have #define SET callMe #define COLUMN(x)
consider following scenario input string = WIPR.NS i have to replace this with WIPR2.NS
I have a relatively simple use case which is failing. Consider the following code:
Consider following example : public class SomeBusinessLayerService : DataService<MyEntityContainer> { [WebInvoke] void DoSomething(string someParam)
Consider following class class test { public: test(int x){ cout<< test \n; } };
Consider following program: static void Main (string[] args) { int i; uint ui; i
Consider following SWT code example: http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.swt.snippets/src/org/eclipse/swt/snippets/Snippet151.java?view=co How can I separate the inline defined class?
Please consider following code: 1. uint16 a = 0x0001; if(a < 0x0002) { //

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.