Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 879683
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:58:24+00:00 2026-05-15T11:58:24+00:00

Consider the following queries. select * from contact where firstname like ‘%some%’ select *

  • 0

Consider the following queries.

select * from contact where firstname like '%some%'

select * from 
    (select * from contact) as t1 
where firstname like '%some%'

The execution plans for both queries are same and executes at same time. But, I was expecting the second query will have a different plan and execute more slowly as it has to select all data from contact and apply filter. It looks like I was wrong.

I am wondering how this is happening?

Database Server : SQL server 2005

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:58:24+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:58 am

    The “query optimiser” is what’s happening. When you run a query, SQL Server uses a cost-based optimiser to identify what is likely to be the best way to fulfil that request (i.e. it’s execution plan). Think about it as a route map from Place A to Place B. There may be many different ways to get from A to B, some will be quicker than others. SQL Server will workout different routes to achieve the end goal of returning the data that satisfies the query and go with one that has an acceptable cost. Note, it doesn’t necessarily analyse EVERY possible way, as that would be unnecessarily expensive.

    In your case, the optimiser has worked out that those 2 queries can be collapsed down to the same thing, hence you get the same plan.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following 2 queries: select tblA.a,tblA.b,tblA.c,tblA.d from tblA where tblA.a not in (select
Out of the following queries, which method would you consider the better one? What
Consider the following SQL (SQL Server 2008) statement: WITH MyResult AS ( SELECT Name,
Consider following example : public class SomeBusinessLayerService : DataService<MyEntityContainer> { [WebInvoke] void DoSomething(string someParam)
Consider following class class test { public: test(int x){ cout<< test \n; } };
Consider the following setup: A windows PC with a LAN interface and a WiFi
Consider the following ruby code test.rb: begin puts thisFunctionDoesNotExist x = 1+1 rescue Exception
Consider the following method signatures: public fooMethod (Foo[] foos) { /*...*/ } and public
Consider the following code: $(a).attr(disabled, disabled); In IE and FF, this will make anchors
Consider the following code: void Handler(object o, EventArgs e) { // I swear o

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.