Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8540029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T11:30:26+00:00 2026-06-11T11:30:26+00:00

Currently I have this for a sorting function: bool operator()( CVParent* lhs, CVParent* rhs

  • 0

Currently I have this for a sorting function:

bool operator()( CVParent* lhs, CVParent* rhs ) 
{
  double dFirstValue  = reinterpret_cast< CVChild * >( lhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
  double dSecondValue = reinterpret_cast< CVChild * >( rhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
  ....
}

Right now the type-id is hardcoded as CVChild* but can it be a parameter? I don’t want to be writing a function for every derived classes of CVParent.

Edit:
I have made changes based on Rost’s recommendation:

class Compare_Functor
{
public:

    Compare_Functor( const long& lFeature, const bool& bIsAscending )
    {
        m_lFeature = lFeature;
        m_bIsAscending = bIsAscending;
    }

    template <class T> 
    bool operator()( CVParent* lhs, CVParent* rhs ) 
    {
      double dFirstValue  = reinterpret_cast< T * >( lhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
      double dSecondValue = reinterpret_cast< T * >( rhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
      ....
    }

private: 

    long m_lFeature;
    bool m_bIsAscending;
}

Current Usage (how to do revised the stl sort function call?):
std::sort( m_pList, m_pList+GetCOunt(), Compare_Functor(lFeature, TRUE) );

I fixed the code. Thank you for everyone’s help!

template <class T>
class Compare_Functor
{
public:

    Compare_Functor( const long& lFeature, const bool& bIsAscending )
    {
        m_lFeature = lFeature;
        m_bIsAscending = bIsAscending;
    }

    bool operator()( CVParent* lhs, CVParent* rhs ) 
    {
      double dFirstValue  = reinterpret_cast< T * >( lhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
      double dSecondValue = reinterpret_cast< T * >( rhs )->GetValue( m_lFeature );
      ....
    }

private: 

    long m_lFeature;
    bool m_bIsAscending;
}


//Usage
std::sort( m_pList, m_pList+GetCOunt(), Compare_Functor<CChild>(lFeature, TRUE) );
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T11:30:27+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 11:30 am

    It’s not possible to pass any dynamic (known in run time only) type to reinterpret_cast. It must be static (known in compile time).

    You could use templates as mentioned in other answer, but you will need to explicitly set the type to cast for each function call because compiler will not be able to deduce it from call expression:

    template <class T> struct Functor
    {
       bool operator()(CVParent* lhs, CVParent* rhs) { ... }
    };
    
    CVParent p1, p2;
    ...
    
    // Usage
    Functor<CVChild1>().operator()(&p1, &p2);
    Functor<CVChild2>().operator()(&p1, &p2);
    Functor<CVChild3>().operator()(&p1, &p2);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently have this: function submit() { document.getElementById(lostpasswordform).click(); // Simulates button click document.lostpasswordform.submit(); //
I currently have this code: PACKETS = {}; function AddPacket(data) local id = data.ID;
I currently have this sql statement that I wrote and it works but it's
I currently have this and it works fine but I wanted to have a
I currently have this code which stores XML into an XML-type column called data,
I currently have this set up and working fine inside a users folder. RewriteEngine
I currently have this code : Private Sub Worksheet_Change(ByVal Target As Range) Dim lastrow
I currently have this code Private Sub Worksheet_Change(ByVal Target As Range) WorksheetChanged(Target, Range(AB3).CurrentRegion, Range(B18:B19))
I currently have this working but it requires me to have a static method
I currently have this statement in my SQL View (SQL Server 2008 R2) which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.