Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4239044
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T02:58:59+00:00 2026-05-21T02:58:59+00:00

Earlier today, I was helping someone with an .htaccess use case, and came up

  • 0

Earlier today, I was helping someone with an .htaccess use case, and came up with a solution that works but can’t quite figure it out myself!

He wanted to be able to:

  • Browse to index.php?id=3&cat=5
  • See the location bar read index/3/5/
  • Have the content served from index.php?id=3&cat=5

The last two steps are fairly typical (usually from the user entering index/3/5 in the first place), but the first step was required because he still had some old-format links in his site and, for whatever reason, couldn’t change them. So he needed to support both URL formats, and have the user always end up seeing the prettified one.

After much to-ing and fro-ing, we came up with the following .htaccess file:

RewriteEngine on

# Prevents browser looping, which does seem
#   to occur in some specific scenarios. Can't
#   explain the mechanics of this problem in
#   detail, but there we go.
RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} 200
RewriteRule .* - [L]

# Hard-rewrite ("[R]") to "friendly" URL.
# Needs RewriteCond to match original querystring.
# Uses "?" in target to remove original querystring,
#   and "%n" backrefs to move its components.
# Target must be a full path as it's a hard-rewrite.
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^id=(\d+)&cat=(\d+)$
RewriteRule ^index\.php$ http://example.com/index/%1/%2/? [L,R]

# Soft-rewrite from "friendly" URL to "real" URL.
# Transparent to browser.
RewriteRule ^index/(\d+)/(\d+)/$ /index.php?id=$1&cat=$2

Whilst it might seem to be a somewhat strange use case (“why not just use the proper links in the first place?“, you might ask), just go with it. Regardless of the original requirement, this is the scenario and it’s driving me mad.

Without the first rule, the client enters into a request loop, trying to GET /index/X/Y/ repeatedly and getting 302 each time. The check on REDIRECT_STATUS makes everything run smoothly. But I would have thought that after the final rule, no more rules would be served, the client wouldn’t make any more requests (note, no [R]), and everything would be gravy.

So… why would this result in a request loop when I take out the first rule?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T02:59:00+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:59 am

    Without being able to tinker with your setup, I can’t say for sure, but I believe this problem is due to the following relatively arcane feature of mod_rewrite:

    When you manipulate a URL/filename in per-directory context mod_rewrite first rewrites the filename back to its corresponding URL (which is usually impossible, but see the RewriteBase directive below for the trick to achieve this) and then initiates a new internal sub-request with the new URL. This restarts processing of the API phases.

    (source: mod_rewrite technical documentation, I highly recommend reading this)

    In other words, when you use a RewriteRule in an .htaccess file, it’s possible that the new, rewritten URL maps to an entirely different directory on the filesystem, in which case the .htaccess file in the original directory wouldn’t apply anymore. So whenever a RewriteRule in an .htaccess file matches the request, Apache has to restart processing from scratch with the modified URL. This means, among other things, that every RewriteRule gets checked again.

    In your case, what happens is that you access /index/X/Y/ from the browser. The last rule in your .htaccess file triggers, rewriting that to /index.php?id=X&cat=Y, so Apache has to create a new internal subrequest with the URL /index.php?id=X&cat=Y. That matches your earlier external redirect rule, so Apache sends a 302 response back to the browser to redirect it to /index/X/Y/. But remember, the browser never saw that internal subrequest; as far as it knows, it was already on /index/X/Y/. So it looks to you as though you’re being redirected from /index/X/Y/ to that same URL, triggering an infinite loop.

    Besides the performance hit, this is probably one of the better reasons that you should avoid putting rewrite rules in .htaccess files when possible. If you move these rules to the main server configuration, you won’t have this problem because matches on the rules won’t trigger internal subrequests. If you don’t have access to the main server configuration files, one way you can get around it (EDIT: or so I thought, although it doesn’t seem to work – see comments) is by adding the [NS] (no subrequest) flag to your external redirect rule,

    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ http://example.com/index/%1/%2/? [L,R,NS]
    

    Once you do that, you should no longer need the first rule that checks the REDIRECT_STATUS.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Earlier today I was discussing with someone that I found out you can use
Earlier today I came across Kaazing's WebSocket API for HTML5. Looks fantastic, but as
Internet Explorer RC 9 was released earlier today, but I can't get it to
This code was working earlier today, then randomly stopped, something must of changed, but
I posted earlier today about template classes, but was pretty far off and got
Up until earlier today, I was under the impression that if I wanted to
I was taken aback earlier today when debugging some code to find that something
I asked a question earlier today, but I think I need to approach it
Earlier today I wrote a small test app for iteratees that composed an iteratee
I have asked this question earlier today but I didn't provide enough information and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.