Question

First let me say that I know it’s better to use the subprocess module, but I’m editing other people’s code and I’m trying to make as few changes as possible, which includes avoiding the importing any new modules. So I’d like to stick to the currently-imported modules (os, sys, and paths) if at all possible.

The code is currently (in a file called postfix-to-mailman.py that some of you may be familiar with):

if local in ('postmaster', 'abuse', 'mailer-daemon'):
  os.execv("/usr/sbin/sendmail", ("/usr/sbin/sendmail", '[e-mail]'))
  sys.exit(0)

This works fine (though I think sys.exit(0) might be never be called and thus be unnecessary).

I believe this replaces the current process with a call to /usr/sbin/sendmail passing it the arguments /usr/sbin/sendmail (for argv[0] i.e. itself) and ‘[e-mail]’, then passes the environment of the current process – including the email message in sys.stdin – to the child process.

What I’d like to do is essentially send another copy of the message before doing this. I can’t use execv again because then execution will stop. So I’ve tried the following:

if local in ('postmaster', 'abuse', 'mailer-daemon'):
  os.spawnv(os.P_WAIT, "/usr/sbin/sendmail", ("/usr/sbin/sendmail", '[e-mail]'))
  os.execv("/usr/sbin/sendmail", ("/usr/sbin/sendmail", '[e-mail]'))
  sys.exit(0)

However, while it sends the message to [e-mail], it never sends it to [e-mail]

This surprised me because I thought using spawn would start a child process and then continue execution in the current process when it returns (or without waiting, if P_NOWAIT is used).

Incidentally, I tried os.P_NOWAIT first, but the message I got at [e-mail] was empty, so at least when I used P_WAIT the message came through intact. But it still never got sent to [e-mail] which is a problem.

I’d rather not use os.system if I can avoid it because I’d rather not go out to a shell environment if it can be avoided (security issues, possible performance? I admit I’m being paranoid here, but if I can avoid os.system I’d still like to).

The only thing I can think of is that the call to os.spawnv is somehow consuming/emptying the contents of sys.stdin, but that doesn’t really make sense either. Ideas?

Answer 1

While it might not make sense, that does appear to be the case

import os

os.spawnv(os.P_WAIT,"/usr/bin/wc", ("/usr/bin/wc",))
os.execv("/usr/bin/wc", ("/usr/bin/wc",))

$ cat j.py | python j.py 
       4       6     106
       0       0       0

In which case you might do something like this

import os
import sys

buf = sys.stdin.read()
wc = os.popen("usr/sbin/sendmail [e-mail]","w")
wc.write(buf)
wc.close()
wc = os.popen("usr/sbin/sendmail [e-mail]","w")
wc.write(buf)
wc.close()
sys.exit(0)