Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6796757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T18:31:34+00:00 2026-05-26T18:31:34+00:00

First off, this question is not what does the constructor property do? – There’s

  • 0

First off, this question is not “what does the constructor property do?” – There’s plenty of good documentation on exactly what it is and how it works: It’s a reference to the function that created the object (which may be inherited from its prototype).

I’m more interested in knowing common use-cases for this property. It seems all good in theory, but when would you actually need a reference to the function that constructed your object? A few ideas would be:

  • Perhaps I want to clone it. I could call the constructor again and
    get another instance of my object. This of course wouldn’t work well
    since you’d potentially be creating an instance of your object’s
    prototype, not the object itself; plus a much preferred method would
    be to create a new object and set that object’s prototype instead.
  • Perhaps you can use it to figure out what the “type” of the object
    is. This seems rather odd, since you can use instanceof or
    Object.prototype.toString() instead.
  • Can you change or re-assign the constructor? Would there ever be a good reason to
    do this?

Hopefully some people can chime in with some good Javascript paterns that make use of the constructor reference, or provide an official explanation for why the property exists.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T18:31:34+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:31 pm

    One case where the constructor property is handy (or would be if it was reliable) is where a function needs to know the type of argument it has been passed, e.g.

    function foo(arg) {
      if ( /* if arg is an array */ ) {
        // deal with array
      } else if ( /* if arg is an object */ ) {
        // deal with object
      }
    }
    

    If the above function is passed an array or object, then typeof will return object in both cases. The constructor property can be used:

      if ( arg.constructor == Array )
    

    But that fails if the array is created in a different frame to where the test is taking place (i.e. it’s Array constructor is a different object to the Array function in the scope of the test).

    So if you rule out frames (or other cases where scope is an issue), then the constructor property is fine to use for this.

    But that does not fix the general issue of the constructor property being writable (and therefore can be set to anything) and cases where the prototype chain is more than trivial.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I hope this question does not come off as broad as it may seem
First off, this is not a question about how to fix a problem because
First off, this question is ripped out from this question. I did it because
First off, let me preface this question by stating that I'm really a pretty
First off - hello, this is my first Stack Overflow question so I'll try
First off, this is NOT a duplicate of: Turn a C string with NULL
First off, there's a bit of background to this issue available on my blog:
First off, apologies if this is a complete noob question which could easily be
First off, I apologize if I'm not using the right terms in my question
First off I apologize... I have posted this question before, but I did a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.