Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6849581
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T01:00:34+00:00 2026-05-27T01:00:34+00:00

For some reason I am iterating over elements of a class in an std::set

  • 0

For some reason I am iterating over elements of a class in an std::set and would like to slightly modify the keys, knowing that the order will be unchanged.

Iterators on std::set are const_iterators because if the key is modified, it might result in a bad order and therefore in set corruption. However I know for sure that my operations won’t change the order of my elements in the set.

For the moment, here is my solution:

class Foo
{
public:
    Foo(int a, int b): a_(a),b_(b) {}
   ~Foo(){}
    bool operator < (const Foo& o) const { return this.a_ < o.a_ ; }
    void incrementB() const { ++b_; } // <-- the problem: it is not const!
private:
    const int a_;
    mutable int b_;                   // <-- I would like to avoid this
}

void f()
{
    std::set<Foo> s;
    // loop and insert many (distinct on a_) Foo elements;
    std::for_each(s.begin(), c.end(), [](const Foo& s) { s.incrementB(); }); // Foo must be const. iterators are const_iterators
}

How would you modify it (I know I could use an std::map but I am curious whether you can suggest other options) to remove mutable and const?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T01:00:34+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:00 am

    You can’t. Set elements are required to be const for container correctness:

    It forces you to realize that the key part needs to be immutable, or the data structure invariants would be broken.

    struct element 
    {
         std::string key_part; // const in the set
    
         bool operator<(const element&o) const { return key_part<o.key_part; }
    
      private:
         mutable int m_cached; // non-key, *NOT* used in operator<
    };
    

    If you wanted to retain the possibility to ‘express’ const-ness in the non-key part, split it out into pairs and store them in a map:

    std::map<std::string /*key_part*/, int /*m_cached*/> mapped;
    

    or, more flexibly:

    struct element 
    {
         std::string key_part; // const in the set
    
         bool operator<(const element&o) const { return key_part<o.key_part; }
    
         struct value {
             int m_cached;
             int m_moredata; //...
         } /*not in the element itself*/;
    };
    
    std::map<element, element::value> mapped;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason the Windows command prompt is special in that you have to
I have some code i'd like to refactor that uses a C# iterator (ie
For some reason I never see this done. Is there a reason why not?
For some reason when I attempt to make a request to an Ajax.net web
For some reason when I create a new namespace in Visual Studio 2008 its
For some reason, when I try to install SQL Server 2008 Express , I
For some reason, lately the *.UDL files on many of my client systems are
For some reason, Section 1 works but Section 2 does not. When run in
For some reason beyond me I can't access the mysql server on a machine.
For some reason after I installed Boot Camp, my os x terminal started to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.