Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 90977
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:57:28+00:00 2026-05-10T22:57:28+00:00

for the following: ( a != b ) ? cout<<not equal : cout<<equal; suppose

  • 0

for the following:

( a != b ) ? cout<<'not equal' : cout<<'equal'; 

suppose I don’t care if it’s equal, how can I use the above statement by substituting cout<<'equal' with a no-op.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:57:29+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:57 pm

    If it really is for a ternary operator that doesn’t need a second action, the best option would be to replace it for an if:

    if (a!=b) cout << 'not equal'; 

    it will smell a lot less.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can one of you explain why the following piece of code does not compile?
How can I compare first n elements of two sets are equal or not?
I'm basically looking for a way to automate typing stuff like the following: cout
If you have the following code: cout << hex << 10; The output is
Consider following class class test { public: test(int x){ cout<< test \n; } };
I have the following code: Some functions: A::A(int i_a) {cout<<int Ctor\n;} //conversion constructor void
Please consider the following code, struct foo { foo() { std::cout << Constructing! <<
I have following code snippet: class ABC{ public: int a; void print(){cout<<hello<<endl;} }; int
I've developed a 'custom' cout, so that I can display text to console and
The following .net to native C code does not work, any ideas extern C

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.