Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6892455
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:32:15+00:00 2026-05-27T06:32:15+00:00

For the following trivial function definitions: printLength1::(Num a)=>String->a printLength1 s = length s printLength2::String->Int

  • 0

For the following trivial function definitions:

printLength1::(Num a)=>String->a
printLength1 s = length s


printLength2::String->Int
printLength2 s = length s

Why are they not the same ? In what situations i should choose one over the other?

And i get this error for printLength1:

Couldn't match type `a' with `Int'
      `a' is a rigid type variable bound by
          the type signature for rpnc :: String -> a at test.hs:20:1
    In the return type of a call of `length'
    In the expression: length s
    In an equation for `rpnc': rpnc s = length s

I understand this error. But how can i fix this ?
I’ve already read some posts here about rigid type variable but still couldn’t understand how to fix it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:32:16+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:32 am

    The first type signature is more general. It means the result can be any Num–it is polymorphic on its return type. So the result of your first function could be used as an Int or an Integer or any other Num instance.

    The problem is that length returns an Int rather than any Num instance. You can fix this using fromIntegral:

    printLength1 :: Num a => String -> a
    printLength1 s = fromIntegral $ length s
    

    Note that the signature of fromIntegral . length (which is the point-free version of the code above) is Num c => [a] -> c. This matches the signature you specified for your printLength1 function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following intentionally trivial function: void ReplaceSome(ref string text) { StringBuilder sb
I'm beginning Haskell... I tried to write the following trivial function in two different
Suppose I want to write a function like the following (as usual, a trivial
Which of the following code snippets is the most pythonic? The calculation is trivial
I'll use the following (trivial) interface as an example: struct IObject { virtual ~IObject()
I didn't write the following code and I am not a Javascript expert. So
can somebody explain why is the following trivial code (implementation of Euclid's algorithm to
I'm new and this is probably very trivial but I have the following method
suppose I have the following class: class MyInteger { private: int n_; public: MyInteger(int
The following code should be pretty self-evident. What I have made up so far

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.