Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9207645
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T00:26:00+00:00 2026-06-18T00:26:00+00:00

for(unsigned int i = 0; i < x.size(); i++) assert(x[i] > 0); When not

  • 0
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < x.size(); i++)
    assert(x[i] > 0);

When not debugging (NDEBUG flag), the resultant is an empty for loop. Is there a clean way to handle this (not executing the empty for loop); preferably without preprocessor directive, since it would defeat the purpose of assert in the first place.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T00:26:01+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 12:26 am

    A good optimizer should be able to eliminate the entire loop when NDEBUG is defined (I’ve just tested mine, and it does do that).

    Alternatively, you could surround the entire loop with #ifndef NDEBUG / #endif. You say this “would defeat the purpose of assert in the first place”, but I don’t really follow the reasoning.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

struct MyClass { int foo () { return 0; } }; unsigned int size
Here I have an example class : template<typename T, unsigned int SIZE> class MyClass
Consider following class of custom array template <typename element, unsigned int size> class array
unsigned int *pMessageLength, MessageLength; char *pszParsePos; ... //DATA into pszParsePos ... printf(\nMessage Length\nb1: %d\nb2:
Unsigned int into a short and back. Is this possible? How to do it
Given: unsigned int a, b, c, d; I want: d = a * b
int plus unsigned int returns an unsigned int. Should it be so? Consider this
struct pointsto_val_def { unsigned int lhs; bitmap rhs; struct pointsto_val_def *next; }; typedef struct
Can someone explain why unsigned int is taking a negative value? An unsigned int
for example: unsigned int a; // value to merge in non-masked bits unsigned int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.