Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 876175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:23:32+00:00 2026-05-15T11:23:32+00:00

gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have seen this in some code I am maintaining. #define

  • 0

gcc 4.4.4 c89

I have seen this in some code I am maintaining.

#define FALSE 0
#define TRUE (!FALSE)

is there any difference in writing the following:

#define FALSE 0
#define TRUE 1

Its been used in some functions like this:

if(condition failed) {
    return FALSE;
}
else {
    return TRUE;
}

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:23:32+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:23 am

    One difference is, in the (!FALSE) case, if you change:

    #define FALSE 0
    

    to

    #define FALSE 1
    

    Your program still “works”, without modifying TRUE… however, it’s unlikely that would be safe anyways, because I’m sure your program relies on constructs such as

    if (funtion_that_returns_FALSE()) {
    }
    

    Which would break if you changed the definition of FALSE. Don’t change it 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have this code snippet that I have to repeat in
gcc 4.4.4 c89 Is there a better way to do this? I have the
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have the following code. #if defined ( __linux__ ) log_msg(stderr,
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I am just wondering is there any standard that should be
gcc 4.4.3 c89 I have some functions that initialize some hardware and return either
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have the following code and 2 structures that have to
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have the following code in my channel.h file typedef struct
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have this in my header file. port.h struct struct_tag; int
The gcc -S option will generate assembly code in AT&T syntax, is there a
gcc c89 I am getting a stack dump on this line: strcpy(comp->persons->name, Joe); However,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.