Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 372709
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:14:13+00:00 2026-05-12T14:14:13+00:00

GCC compiler supports __builtin_expect statement that is used to define likely and unlikely macros.

  • 0

GCC compiler supports __builtin_expect statement that is used to define likely and unlikely macros.

eg.

#define likely(expr)    (__builtin_expect(!!(expr), 1))
#define unlikely(expr)  (__builtin_expect(!!(expr), 0))

Is there an equivalent statement for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, or something equivalent ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:14:13+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    I say just punt

    There is nothing like it. There is __assume(), but don’t use it, it’s a different kind of optimizer directive.

    Really, the reason the gnu builtin is wrapped in a macro is so you can just get rid of it automatically if __GNUC__ is not defined. There isn’t anything the least bit necessary about those macros and I bet you will not notice the run time difference.

    Summary

    Just get rid of (null out) *likely on non-GNU. You won’t miss it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any C++11 compiler for Windows that supports the new C++11 type traits,
Which version of the gcc compiler supports free const_iterator methods for containers, e.g.: cbegin
Anyone know this compiler feature? It seems GCC support that. How does it work?
Is there a compiler that has good support for the new C++0x? I use
Do you know how strong VLIW architectures support exists in GCC compiler infrastructure? I
I am using the GCC compiler but I want the to code the actually
I compiled this (gcc compiler) : #include< stdio.h> main() { unsigned char ch; FILE
I compiled this (gcc compiler): #include <stdio.h> main() { struct { a:1; b:2; }
I was trying to execute this code through gcc compiler: #include <stdio.h> int main()
I am working on a platform with a gcc compiler however boost cannot compile

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.