Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6233863
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T10:22:42+00:00 2026-05-24T10:22:42+00:00

gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 c89 I have a signal handler declared like this: /* Setup

  • 0

gcc (GCC) 4.6.0
c89

I have a signal handler declared like this:

   /* Setup signal handler */
    struct sigaction new_action;
    new_action.sa_handler = g_signal_handler;
    new_action.sa_flags = SA_ONSTACK;

    if(sigaction(SIGINT, &new_action, NULL) == -1) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Failed to setup signal handlers.");
        return -1;
    }

When I was running my code through valgrind i.e. valgrind --leak-check=full it picked up the following error:

==5206== Syscall param rt_sigaction(act->sa_mask) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==5206==    at 0x347A435455: __libc_sigaction (in /lib64/libc-2.14.so)

So aftering looking at the man pages I decided to set like this, just to test with:

new_action.sa_mask = SA_NODEFER;

However, that just give me the following error:

error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘__sigset_t’ from type ‘int’

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T10:22:43+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 10:22 am

    Try this:

    /* Signals blocked during the execution of the handler. */
    sigemptyset(&new_action.sa_mask);
    sigaddset(&new_action.sa_mask, SIGINT);
    

    The sa_mask field allows us to specify a set of signals that aren’t
    permitted to interrupt execution of this handler. In addition, the
    signal that caused the handler to be invoked is automatically added
    to the process signal mask.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have this in my header file. port.h struct struct_tag; int
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have seen this in some code I am maintaining. #define
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have the following structure. struct device_sys { char device[STRING_SIZE]; int
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have this code snippet that I have to repeat in
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have the following code in my channel.h file typedef struct
gcc 4.4.4 c89 Is there a better way to do this? I have the
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have a wave file: 8000 Hz 16 bit I am
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have a function that has to run (config_relays). It make
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have the following enum: enum drop_options_e { drop_ssm, drop_snm, drop_ssb
gcc 4.4.1 c89 I have the following code snippet: #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> char

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.