Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1103027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T01:16:42+00:00 2026-05-17T01:16:42+00:00

Given the following Core Data Model: -> : to-one releationship ->>: to-many relationship Entity

  • 0

Given the following Core Data Model:

-> : to-one releationship  
->>: to-many relationship

Entity A ->> Entity B 
Entity B -> A // each B belongs to exactly one A  
Entity B ->> B // a B can be related to other B's

So in class A:

@property (nonatomic, retain) NSSet *Bs;

In class B:

@property (nonatomic, retain) A *A;  
@property (nonatomic, retain) NSSet *Bs; 

Assume I have an NSArray *myArray containing (Bj, Bk).

What I want is to fetch all B‘s which belong to Ax and are related to Bj and Bk:

The code below works, but is completely ugly, since I have to hardcode the NSPredicate based on the number (here it’s 2, but it could be 10 or so) of B‘s in the array:

NSEntityDescription *fetchedEntity = [NSEntityDescription entityForName:@"B" inManagedObjectContext:self.managedObjectContext];
[NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"A == %@ and (Bs contains %@) and (Bs contains %@)", Ax, [myArray objectAtIndex:0], [myArray objectAtIndex:1]];

How can I rewrite the predicate so that it is more generic? It must be so obvious, but I just don’t see it…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T01:16:43+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 1:16 am

    Does

    [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"A==%@ AND (ALL %@ IN Bs)", Ax, myArray];
    

    do what you expect? I am not sure (and away from my OS X box) whether this predicate is translatable to SQL for the Core Data SQLite engine. You may need a SUBQUERY expression:

    [NSPredicate preidcateWithFormat:@"A==%@ and SUBQUERY(Bs, $x, $x IN %@).@count == %d", Ax, myArray, myArray.count];
    

    This assumes that the items in myArray are unique.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given following Ruby statements: (Read input and store each word in array removing spaces
Given the following XML: <current> <login_name>jd</login_name> </current> <people> <person> <first>John</first> <last>Doe</last> <login_name>jd</login_name> </preson> <person>
Given the following: List<List<Option>> optionLists; what would be a quick way to determine the
Given the following example, why do I have to explicitly use the statement b->A::DoSomething()
Given the following: declare @a table ( pkid int, value int ) declare @b
Given the following XML structure <html> <body> <div> <span>Test: Text2</span> </div> <div> <span>Test: Text3</span>
Given the following: &row->count Would &(row->count) be evaluated or (&row)->count be evaluated in C++?
Given the following code (that doesn't work): while True: # Snip: print out current
Given the following canvas: <Canvas> <Canvas.LayoutTransform> <ScaleTransform ScaleX=1 ScaleY=1 CenterX=.5 CenterY=.5 /> </Canvas.LayoutTransform> <Button
Given the following idioms: 1) variable = value1 if condition variable = value2 2)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.