Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6665509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:43:51+00:00 2026-05-26T02:43:51+00:00

Given the following example classes in my.package … public class Foo { public void

  • 0

Given the following example classes in my.package…

public class Foo {
    public void logicNotInBar()     {/*code*/}
    public void logicBarOverrides() {/*code*/}
}

public class Bar extends Foo {
    public void logicBarOverrides() {/*code*/}
}

and the following Spring-AOP pointcuts…

<aop:pointcut id="myPointcutAll" expression="execution(* my.package.*.*(..))"   />
<aop:pointcut id="myPointcutFoo" expression="execution(* my.package.Foo.*(..))" />
<aop:pointcut id="myPointcutBar" expression="execution(* my.package.Bar.*(..))" />

What is the result of advice applied to the above pointcuts on instances of Bar? In particular…

Bar bar = new Bar();
bar.logicNotInBar();      // will myPointcutBar advice trigger?
bar.logicBarOverrides();  // is myPointcutFoo ignored here?

I think I am missing some basic truth of how pointcuts interact with inheritance so an under-the-hood explanation/doc would probably go a long way.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:43:51+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:43 am

    From aspectj documentation:

    When matching method-execution join points, if the execution pointcut
    method signature specifies a declaring type, the pointcut will only
    match methods declared in that type, or methods that override methods
    declared in or inherited by that type. So the pointcut

    execution(public void Middle.*())

    picks out all method executions
    for public methods returning void and having no arguments that are
    either declared in, or inherited by, Middle, even if those methods are
    overridden in a subclass of Middle. So the pointcut would pick out the
    method-execution join point for Sub.m() in this code:

      class Super {
        protected void m() { ... }
      }
      class Middle extends Super {
      }
      class Sub extends Middle {
        public void m() { ... }
      }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is just an example, but given the following model: class Foo(models.model): bar =
Given the following example (using JUnit with Hamcrest matchers): Map<String, Class<? extends Serializable>> expected
Consider the following two Java classes: a.) class Test { void foo(Object foobar) {
I have the following classes: public class ComplexType { public long? Code { get;
Given the following code, how do I resolve the right SomeInstance in autofac? public
assume the following class is given: class Base{ public: Base() {} Base( const Base&
HI, I have the following code: class Libr { public: Libr(); std::string book; class
Given the following example, why do I have to explicitly use the statement b->A::DoSomething()
Given the following example data: Users +--------------------------------------------------+ | ID | First Name | Last
Given the following simple example: List<string> list = new List<string>() { One, Two, Three,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.