Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 86749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:17:42+00:00 2026-05-10T22:17:42+00:00

Given the schema PERSON { name, spouse } where PERSON.spouse is a foreign key

  • 0

Given the schema

 PERSON { name, spouse } 

where PERSON.spouse is a foreign key to PERSON.name, NULLs will be necessary when a person is unmarried or we don’t have any info.

Going with the argument against nulls, how do you avoid them in this case?

I have an alternate schema

 PERSON { name } SPOUSE { name1, name2 } 

where SPOUSE.name* are FKs to PERSON. The problem I see here is that there is no way to ensure someone has only one spouse (even with all possible UNIQUE constraints, it would be possible to have two spouses).

What’s the best way to factor out nulls in bill-of-materials style relations?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:17:42+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:17 pm

    All right, use Auto-IDs and then use a Check Constraint. The ‘Name1’ column (which would only be an int ID) will be force to only have ODD numbered IDs and Name2 will only have EVEN.

    Then create a Unique Constraint for Column1 and Column2.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 59k
  • Answers 59k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer There's a way to do this built in to Visual… May 11, 2026 at 9:01 am
  • added an answer For anyone who is interested to know the answer: I… May 11, 2026 at 9:01 am
  • added an answer Use VB XML literals: Dim marker2 = From x In… May 11, 2026 at 9:01 am

Related Questions

Given the schema PERSON { name, spouse } where PERSON.spouse is a foreign key
Given the schema: MACHINE_TYPE { machine_type } MACHINE { machine, machine_type } SORT_PLAN {
Given the URL (single line): http://test.example.com/dir/subdir/file.html How can I extract the following parts using
Given the following XML: <current> <login_name>jd</login_name> </current> <people> <person> <first>John</first> <last>Doe</last> <login_name>jd</login_name> </preson> <person>
Given the constraint of only using T-Sql in Sql Server 2005, is there a
Given the following: List<List<Option>> optionLists; what would be a quick way to determine the
Given the following example, why do I have to explicitly use the statement b->A::DoSomething()
Given the key for some registry value (e.g. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\blah\blah\blah\foo) how can I: Safely determine
Given the case I made two independent changes in one file: eg. added a
Given the following: declare @a table ( pkid int, value int ) declare @b

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.