Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 502609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:18:32+00:00 2026-05-13T06:18:32+00:00

Here is an example : public class B<T> {} public class D : B<int>

  • 0

Here is an example :

public class B<T> {}
public class D : B<int> {}
public class A<T, S> where T : B<S> {}
public class C : A<D, int> {}

public class Test1
{
    public class test1
    {
        A<D, int> t = new C();
    }
}

What I would like do to is in declaring class C, only say : C : A<D>. Why I need to repeat int ? Because int is already a part of D.

Same in the test1 method. I would like to write : A<D> t = new C();

How, can I achieve that ?

UPDATE

Here with more realistic class names :

public class MyModel<T> { }
public class MyTrueModel : MyModel<int> { }

public class MyManager<T,S> where T : MyModel<S> { }
public class MyTrueManager : MyManager<MyTrueModel, int> { }

public class Test1
{
    public class test1
    {
        MyManager<MyTrueModel, int> t = new MyManager<MyTrueModel, int>();
    }
}

All the problem come from the class MyManager. If I was able to do something like : MyManager<T> where T : MyModel it’d would be great.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:18:32+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:18 am

    Here’s your code:

    public class B<T> {}
    public class D : B<int> {}
    public class A<T, S> where T : B<S> {}
    public class C : A<D, int> {}
    public class Test1 {
        public class test1 {
            A<D, int> t = new C();
        }
    }
    

    Here’s equivalent code:

    public class B<T> {}
    public class D : B<int> {}
    public class A<U, V> where U : B<V> {}
    public class C : A<D, int> {}
    public class Test1 {
        public class test1 {
            A<D, int> t = new C();
        }
    }
    

    The point is that the U in A<U, V> is a dummy. When you replace U with T (and V with S) and write A<T, S> the T does not refer to the same T in B<T>. This is why you must use C : A<D, int>. If you were to only write A<D> the compiler does not know (and nor should it; see my comment below on free versus unbound variables) that you want to use int for T in B<T>.

    All the problem come from the class MyManager. If I was able to do something like : MyManager<T> where T : MyModel it’s would be great.

    This is not possible. MyModel is not declared as a type. Only MyModel<T> is a type. More specifically, it is an unbounded generic type. When you specify a type argument (e.g., MyModel<int>) then it will be a constructed type.

    At this risk of confusing you further (on this admittedly confusing issue), it might help you read about free and unbounded variables.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 368k
  • Answers 368k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Entity Framework designer is terrible - I've had the… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If by "hijack" you meant sniff the packets then what… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you want two actions to be atomic, embed them… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.