Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 109215
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:02:04+00:00 2026-05-11T02:02:04+00:00

Hey stackoverflow community! I’m having an issue where a highly involved algorithmic program is

  • 0

Hey stackoverflow community!

I’m having an issue where a highly involved algorithmic program is using TOO LITTLE cpu utilization: somewhere between 3 and 4%. It is taking very long to return results, and I believe it’s just not working hard enough.

Do any of you geniuses have any ideas why this would occur – if anything I would expect 100% utilization. One additional detail is that the program makes inserts into a sqlite3 database, and thus yes, there are a lot of JNI calls via the sqlite3jdbc library I believe. (Note that I wanted to defer these inserts with a PreparedQuery batch earlier, but this caused major memory problems – there’s a lot of data).

Thanks in advance

UPDATE: Fixed. Yeah, I was just being a doofus, but I didn’t expect that sqlite would start a new transaction and do so much overhead.

I now use a PreparedStatement and queue 32768 entries before insert – seemed like a good enough number to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:02:04+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:02 am

    Obviously the database calls are causing delays. Isn’t it an option to create smaller batches and test if that helps?? Maybe you could parallelize the algorithm as well to have a queue somewhere taking results and another thread cleaning out that queue?

    edit:

    There are also some other problem areas:

    • Database optimalization (model)
    • Database server configuration
    • Disk speed

    All these factors should be taken into account

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 201k
  • Answers 201k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You probably want java.awt.Robot.getPixelColor(x, y). It'll be faster than grabbing… May 12, 2026 at 8:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I have to say, go with jQuery - not only… May 12, 2026 at 8:08 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Adding overflow:hidden to the div should sort it out. Can't… May 12, 2026 at 8:08 pm

Related Questions

Hey stackoverflow community! I'm having an issue where a highly involved algorithmic program is
Hey guys i wrote a quick test. I want delete to call deleteMe which
When entering a question, stackoverflow presents you with a list of questions that it
Not strictly a programming question, but I was programming at the time and couldn't
I know very little about JavaScript but despite this I'm trying to cobble something

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.