Home/ Questions/Q 7547111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-30T09:22:13+00:00

How can I define pipe :: Handle -> Handle -> IO () in the

  • 0

How can I define

pipe :: Handle -> Handle -> IO ()

in the most efficient way in Haskell (platform 2011-04 or ghc 7.4)?

Update 1: How to write a minimal-overhead proxy to localhost:3389 in Haskell?

Update 2: Using GNU/Linux system call `splice` for zero-copy Socket to Socket data transfers in Haskell

Uses the GNU/Linux system call splice for zero-copy data piping between two network sockets, also makes room for a portable socket-to-socket splice substitute written in Haskell, which uses (mallocBytes, hGetBufSome and hPutBuf) a one-time allocated user space buffer throughout the data transfer loop avoiding tiny allocations that lead to pressure on the garbage collector with repeated calls to recv, sendAll from the bytestring package.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I don’t think you’ll find any non-FFI solution that significantly beats either:

    almostForever $ Data.ByteString.hGetSome h1 nr >>= Data.ByteString.hPutStr h2

    Or perhaps you’d gain a little using lazy byte strings:

    Data.ByteString.Lazy.hGetContents  h1 >>= Data.ByteString.Lazy.hPut h2

    If you have time then run a benchmark of these. If you don’t have time, then just do one and don’t worry so much about performance unless it’s actually an issue.

    • 0