Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8402463
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T22:04:23+00:00 2026-06-09T22:04:23+00:00

How can I do this more efficiently? Ideally so I can call showTag without

  • 0

How can I do this more efficiently? Ideally so I can call showTag without any arguments and it returns the correct comboBox.

I added the argument table to define whether the value returned by showTag was from comboBox1 or comboBox2. So if i want the value for comboBox1 I call showTag(1), if I want the value for comboBox2 I call showTag(2)

//Return the currently selected language
public string showTag(int table)
{
    string LanguageSelection = String.Empty;
    if (table == 1)
    {
        LanguageSelection = comboBox1.SelectedItem.ToString();
    }
    else
    {
        LanguageSelection = comboBox2.SelectedItem.ToString();
    }
    string[] LanguageTag = LanguageSelection.Split(' ');
    string tag = LanguageTag[1].Replace("<", "").Replace(">", "");
    return tag;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T22:04:25+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 10:04 pm

    you have to add a SelectedIndexChanged event on the same function for your 2 combobox (go to properties of your two combobox and click event and SelectedIndexChanged)

    private void ComboBox_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
    {
                ComboBox cb =  (ComboBox )sender ;
                LanguageSelection = cb.SelectedItem.ToString();
                string[] LanguageTag = LanguageSelection.Split(' ');
                //string tag have to be declared in your application at a global level
                tag = LanguageTag[1].Replace("<", "").Replace(">", "");
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there anything wrong with this code or can this be done more efficiently?
How can this be done more elegant and without creating new objects? List<Move> playerMoves
I thought I have seen this somewhere but can't find it any more on
How can I write this jQuery more efficiently? The goal is to be able
How can I write this code more cleanly/concisely? /// <summary> /// Creates a set
Can an if statement have more than one then statements? # this works a
I have written this code to join ArrayList elements: Can it be optimized more?
I'm going to try to explain this best I can I will provide more
What structures of Scala can be used more efficiently than in Java, to increase
I've read some explanations of how autocorrelation can be more efficiently calculated using the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.