Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 715273
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T05:10:07+00:00 2026-05-14T05:10:07+00:00

How is it better to encode a complex number into RGB pixel and vice

  • 0

How is it better to encode a complex number into RGB pixel and vice versa?

Probably (logarithm of) an absolute value goes to brightness and an argument goes to hue.

Desaturated pixes should receive randomized argument in reverse transformation.

Something like:
0 -> (0,0,0)
1 -> (255,0,0)
-1 -> (0,255,255)
0.5 -> (128,0,0)
i -> (255,255,0)
-i -> (255,0,255)

(0,0,0) -> 0
(255,255,255) -> e^(i * random)
(128,128,128) -> 0.5 * e^(i *random)
(0,128,128) -> -0.5

Are there ready-made formulas for that?

Edit: Looks like I just need to convert RGB to HSB and back.

Edit 2: Existing RGB -> HSV converter fragment:

if (hsv.sat == 0) {
    hsv.hue = 0; // !
    return hsv;
}

I don’t want 0. I want random. And not just if hsv.sat==0, but if it is lower that it should be (“should be” means maximum saturation, saturation that is after transformation from complex number).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T05:10:07+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:10 am

    You will have many problems:

    |RGB|=2^24 and |C|=?

    Supposing your complex numbers set is finite and discrete, i think the best method for RGB System is like this:
    Cartesian Axis:

    alt text

    Polar Axis:

    alt text
    (source: sitmo.com)

    i think it will be unique and a little semantic: something like counter grids and coloring of geographical maps and medical images analysis.

    you can use HSL system and polar axis instead:

    alt text

    what you want to do with this encoding?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible, or reasonable, to encode bitmap data into JSON to be returned
They both encode html Why microsoft use several different function? Which one is better?
How to safely encode PHP string into alphanumeric only string? E.g. Hey123 & 5
Better way to do it (without QImage )?: QImage image(width, height, QImage::Format_RGB888); memcpy(image.bits(), m_frameRGB->data[0],
Better to give an example, to illustrate what i am describing. The div element
For better description, +-----------------------+ | Desktop (screen) | | | | | | +----------+
any better way to write this ? $(this).parent().parent().find( dd ul).toggle(); update.. I am trying
Is better to use the below statement Convert.ToInt32(0 + stringValue) If not then why?
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is it better / faster inside an event listener to use this or event.target

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.