Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 617029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:23:25+00:00 2026-05-13T18:23:25+00:00

I am trying to optimize my ASP.NET MVC application using some techniques that include

  • 0

I am trying to optimize my ASP.NET MVC application using some techniques that include URL generation tweaking a la: http://www.chadmoran.com/blog/2009/4/23/optimizing-url-generation-in-aspnet-mvc-part-2.html

If the speed difference is so large between using RouteValueDictionary in place of anonymous classes, then should I also look to use Dictionary in place of anonymous classes when defining html attributes?

For example, should I do this:

Html.ActionLink("LinkName", "Action", "Controller",
                new RouteValueDictionary { { "id", Model.Id } },
                new { @class = "someCSSClass" })

or should I further optimize by doing this:

Html.ActionLink("LinkName", "Action", "Controller",
                new RouteValueDictionary { { "id", Model.Id } },
                new Dictionary<string, object> { { "class", "someCSSClass" } })

I know it’s even faster to use Url.Action, or better yet to use the RouteLink technique, but I’m just wondering whether anonymous classes should be completely avoided for the sake of speed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:23:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:23 pm

    Yes, it’s faster to use the Dictionary.

    Is it fast enough to make a difference? Only a profiler can tell you that, for your application. I’d suggest that if it actually makes a difference then you should be caching your view results anyway.

    I tend to stick with the Dictionary versions, though, because the strong typing helps to cut through the insane mess of overloads to ActionLink. Passing an object makes it way too easy to end up with the wrong overload. The speed is just a bonus.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 312k
  • Answers 312k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try: preg_replace('/^[0-9]+\. +/', '', $string); Which gives: php > print_r(preg_replace('/^[0-9]+\.… May 13, 2026 at 10:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Solved it. I had it marked as a Java EE… May 13, 2026 at 10:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can embed resources in jar file - this is… May 13, 2026 at 10:33 pm

Related Questions

I am trying to optimize my MySQL queries and I need some help. Here
I am trying to optimize my TCP/IP settings such as TCP Window size, MSS
Currently I need to run two queries to get both the total amount of
When getting indexed by search engines, is there a difference if the public side
I am trying to optimize one part of my code that inserts data into

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.