Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6131467
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T16:58:43+00:00 2026-05-23T16:58:43+00:00

I am working on a legacy database that has 2 tables that have a

  • 0

I am working on a legacy database that has 2 tables that have a 1:1 relationship.
Currently, I have one type (1Test:1Result) for each of these tables defined
I would like to merge these particular tables into a single class.

The current types look like this

public class Result 
{
    public          string      Id                  { get; set; }
    public          string      Name                { get; set; }
    public          string      Text                { get; set; }
    public          string      Units               { get; set; }
    public          bool        OutOfRange          { get; set; }
    public          string      Status              { get; set; }
    public          string      Minimum             { get; set; }
    public          string      Maximum             { get; set; }

    public virtual  Instrument  InstrumentUsed      { get; set; }

    public virtual  Test        ForTest             { get; set; }
}


public class Test
{
    public          int     Id            { get; set; }
    public          string  Status        { get; set; }
    public          string  Analysis      { get; set; }
    public          string  ComponentList { get; set; }
    public virtual  Sample  ForSample     { get; set; }
    public virtual  Result  TestResult    { get; set; }
}

I would prefer them to look like this

public class TestResult
{
    public          int        Id              { get; set; }
    public          string     Status          { get; set; }
    public          string     Analysis        { get; set; }
    public          string     ComponentList   { get; set; }
    public          string     TestName        { get; set; }
    public          string     Text            { get; set; }
    public          string     Units           { get; set; }
    public          bool       OutOfRange      { get; set; }
    public          string     Status          { get; set; }
    public          string     Minimum         { get; set; }
    public          string     Maximum         { get; set; }

    public virtual  Instrument InstrumentUsed { get; set; }
}

I am currently using the fluent API for mapping these to our legacy Oracle database.

What would be the best method of combining these into a single class?
Please note that this is a legacy database. Changing the tables is not an option and creating views is not a viable solution at this point in the project.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T16:58:44+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:58 pm

    You can use Entity Splitting to achieve this if you have the same primary key in both tables.

      modelBuilder.Entity<TestResult>()
        .Map(m =>
          {
            m.Properties(t => new { t.Name, t.Text, t.Units /*other props*/ });
            m.ToTable("Result");
          })
        .Map(m =>
          {
            m.Properties(t => new { t.Status, t.Analysis /*other props*/});
            m.ToTable("Test");
          });
    

    Here’s a useful article

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on a legacy database table that has a phone no. field but
I am working with a legacy database that has a table to store up
Im working on a legacy database, that cant be changed. I have a table
I have a legacy database that I am working with a basic column layout
I have a 'legacy' DB2 database that has many other applications and users. Trying
I'm working with a legacy database in Oracle and some of my tables have
I am currently working on a (legacy) programme that has been written in C++
I have a legacy database that I'm working on getting ActiveRecord to work with.
I am working with a legacy database that cannot have its structure changed (at
I have recently started working on a legacy application that has most of its

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.