Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6680561
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:29:20+00:00 2026-05-26T04:29:20+00:00

I am working on an exercise based on this image. I have found the

  • 0

Graph Theory

I am working on an exercise based on this image. I have found the maximum clique size to be 4. I have a few questions on the concept of graph theory.

By definition, a clique is a complete subgraph where each pair of vertices are connected. Would this mean that if I was counting 3-cliques, (3,4,5), (3,4,6), (3,5,6), and (4,5,6) would count as 3-cliques? Or should I omit those subgraphs since they are part of the 4-clique.

Does every graph have only one maximum clique? Imagining it visually in my mind, I feel like it is possible to have more than one maximum clique.

One of the questions in the exercise asks if every graph with one or more nodes must have at least one clique. Is there such thing as a 2-clique (just an edge) or should every clique form a closed shape?

I can’t seem to draw an instance of a 4-clique that does not have a 3-clique, so it is safe to assume that every 4-clique has at least one 3-clique? How would I go about checking for something like this on a larger scale?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:29:21+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:29 am

    First of all, all those 3-cliques you mentioned are indeed cliques.
    As you said, a clique is a subgraph where all the nodes are connected to all the other nodes. So in your example, (3,4,5) is a clique, and so is (3,4,5,6), and so are (3) and (3,4) (which also answers some of your other questions).

    Regarding maximum cliques, of course you could have more than 1 – for example, if you take the (3,4,5,6) from your graph, duplicate it to (3′,4′,5′,6′), and connect 3 with 3′, then you have 2 4-cliques in your graph, but no 5-cliques.

    Also, any subgraph of a clique is also a clique, since every subgraph still satisfies the demand for all nodes being connected to all the other ones. For example in your graph, (3,4,5,6) is a 4-clique. Take any 3 nodes from there, and you shall get a 3-clique. Take 2, and you get a 2-clique. So in fact, not only every 4-clique has at least 1 3-clique in it, but it has exactly 4 3-cliques in it (that’s 4C3).

    Note, however, that sometimes cliques are defined as having 2 or more (or sometimes 3 or more) nodes, because anything smaller is a bit trivial, for lack of a better word.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a learning exercise in expression trees. I have this working code: class
I am working on the exercise questions of book The Lambda calculus . One
I have recently been working on a exercise in a book I have been
I'm working on this Exercise 49 in Learn Ruby the Hard Way The exercise
I am new to Javascript and I am working on an exercise I found
I'm currently working through some exercises in a c++ book, which uses text based
I've been working through Practical Common Lisp and as an exercise decided to write
I'm working on building a pretty simple site mainly as an exercise in learning
One long term project I have is working through all the exercises of SICP.
While working on a simple programming exercise, I produced a while loop (DO loop

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.