Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6115333
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T15:04:44+00:00 2026-05-23T15:04:44+00:00

I have recently been working on a exercise in a book I have been

  • 0

I have recently been working on a exercise in a book I have been reading. The task was to create a program that prints all the numbers between 1-256 in their binary, octal and hexadecimal equivalents. We were only supposed to use methods we had learned so far in the book, which meant only using for, while and do..while loops, if and else if statements, converting integers to ASCII equivalents and some more basic stuff (e.g. cmath and iomanip).

So after some work, here is my result. However, it is messy and un-elegant and obfuscated. Does anyone have any suggestions to increase code efficiency (or elegance… :P) and performance?

#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
int decimalValue, binaryValue, octalValue, hexadecimalValue, numberOfDigits;
cout << "Decimal\t\tBinary\t\tOctal\t\tHexadecimal\n\n";
for (int i = 1; i <= 256; i++)
{
    binaryValue = 0;
    octalValue = 0;
    hexadecimalValue = 0;
    if (i != 0) 
    {
    int x, j, e, c, r = i, tempBinary, powOfTwo, tempOctal, tempDecimal;
    for (j = 0; j <=8; j++) //Starts to convert to binary equivalent
    {
        x = pow(2.0, j);
        if (x == i)
        {
              powOfTwo = 1;
              binaryValue = pow(10.0, j);
              break;
        }
        else if (x > i)
        {
              powOfTwo = 0;
              x /= 2;
              break;
        }
    }
    if (powOfTwo == 0)
    {
    for (int k = j-1; k >= 0; k--)
    {
        if ((r-x)>=0)
        {
           r -= x;
           tempBinary = pow(10.0, k);
           x /= 2;
        }
        else if ((r-x)<0)
        {
           tempBinary = 0;
           x /= 2;
        }
        binaryValue += tempBinary;
    }
    } //Finished converting
    int counter = ceil(log10(binaryValue+1)); //Starts on octal equivalent
    int iter;
    if (counter%3 == 0)
    {
       iter = counter/3;
    }
    else if (counter%3 != 0)
    {
       iter = (counter/3)+1; 
    }
    c = binaryValue;
    for (int h = 0; h < iter; h++)
    {
        tempOctal = c%1000;
        int count = ceil(log10(tempOctal+1));
        tempDecimal = 0;
        for (int counterr = 0; counterr < count; counterr++)
        {
            if (tempOctal%10 != 0)
            {
                 e = pow(2.0, counterr);
                 tempDecimal += e;
            }
            tempOctal /= 10;
        }
        octalValue += (tempDecimal * pow(10.0, h));
        c /= 1000;
    }//Finished Octal conversion
    cout << i << "\t\t" << binaryValue << setw(21-counter) << octalValue << "\t\t";
    int c1, tempHex, tempDecimal1, e1, powOf;
    char letter;
    if (counter%4 == 0)//Hexadecimal equivalent
    {
       iter = counter/4;
    }
    else if (counter%4 != 0)
    {
       iter = (counter/4)+1;
    }
    c1 = binaryValue;
    for (int h = 0, g = iter-1; h < iter; h++, g--)
    {
        powOf = g*4;
        if (h == 0)
        {
              tempHex = c1 / pow(10.0, powOf);
        }
        else if (h > 0)
        {
             tempHex = c1 / pow(10.0, powOf);
             tempHex %= 10000;
        }
        int count = ceil(log10(tempHex+1));
        tempDecimal1 = 0;
        for (int counterr = 0; counterr < count; counterr++)
        {
            if (tempHex%10 != 0)
            {
                 e1 = pow(2.0, counterr);
                 tempDecimal1 += e1;
            }
            tempHex /= 10;
        }
        if (tempDecimal1 <= 9)
        {
        cout << tempDecimal1;
        }
        else if (tempDecimal1 > 9)
        {
        cout << char(tempDecimal1+55); //ASCII's numerical value for A is 65. Since 10-15 are supposed to be letters you just add 55
        }
    }
    cout << endl;
    }
}
system("pause");
return 0;
}

Any recommendations for improvement will be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T15:04:44+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:04 pm

    Break out the functions for each output type, then loop through the integer list and output each in turn by calling the function for each different format.

    for (int i = 1; i <= 256; ++i)
    {
      printBin(i);
      printHex(i);
      printOct(i);
    }
    

    Fundamental problem is that a function this long needs refactoring to be more modular. Imagine you are writing the code for someone else to use. How can they call your main? How do they understand what each section of code is doing? They can’t. If you make each section of code that has a particular job to do callable as a function then it’s easier to understand its intent, and to reuse later.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have recently been working with someone on a project that is very ajax
I have recently been working on a C# application that calls a webservice over
I have recently been working with a COM+ component that processes an input XML
I have recently been tasked to working on code that uses Java CUP. Does
So recently I have been working on phonebook project that uses Binary Search Tree.
On a rails project that I know to have been working as recently as
I have been recently assigned a task in which I need to create a
I have recently been working with Python using Komodo Edit and other simpler editors
I have recently been working on a Pastebin script (for fun) and I've come
Recently I've been working on some embedded devices, where we have some structs and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.