Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8710489
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T04:38:19+00:00 2026-06-13T04:38:19+00:00

I am working with a legacy database tying together multiple tables (4 INNER JOINS

  • 0

I am working with a legacy database tying together multiple tables (4 INNER JOINS and an OUTER LEFT JOIN); because of this and how the tables have to be joined together, it’s really hard to consolidate the data. I’ve gotten this far:

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| EmployeeName | HireDate | Title | Mandatory30 | Mandatory90 | MandatoryPA |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Stewart, P.  | 1/1/01   | CO    | 1/1/02      | NULL        | NULL        |
| Stewart, P.  | 1/1/01   | CO    | NULL        | 1/2/12      | NULL        |
| Frakes, J.   | 5/5/05   | XO    | 5/5/05      | NULL        | NULL        |
| Frakes, J.   | 5/5/05   | XO    | NULL        | 5/6/05      | NULL        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

How can I consolidate this into something closer to the following?

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| EmployeeName | HireDate | Title | Mandatory30 | Mandatory90 | MandatoryPA |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Stewart, P.  | 1/1/01   | CO    | 1/1/02      | 1/2/12      | NULL        |
| Frakes, J.   | 5/5/05   | XO    | 5/5/05      | 5/6/05      | NULL        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

There are actually 5 of these MandatoryN fields but hopefully that doesn’t make too much of a difference in the solution.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T04:38:20+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 4:38 am

    Try something like this:

    SELECT EMPLOYEENAME, 
           HIREDATE, 
           TITLE, 
           Max(MANDATORY30) AS Mandatory30, 
           Max(MANDATORY90) AS Mandatory90, 
           Max(MANDATORYPA) AS MandatoryPA 
      FROM TABLE 
     GROUP BY EMPLOYEENAME, 
              HIREDATE, 
              TITLE 
    

    You can add as many fields as you want/need.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working with a legacy database in Oracle and some of my tables have
Basically, I have issues working with a legacy database where the tables I am
I'm working with a legacy database and have following mappings: PersonBase: <?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8
Background: I am working on a legacy DB2 database, so I have no control
Im working on a legacy database, that cant be changed. I have a table
I have a legacy database which can't be changed because it's hooked up to
I'm working on a legacy database. Specifically, changing a report. I have identified the
I am working with a legacy database schema that looks like this: product_table table
I'm working on a legacy database that is complete non-sense. I have a table
I am working with a legacy database that cannot have its structure changed (at

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.