Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6861637
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T02:33:36+00:00 2026-05-27T02:33:36+00:00

I can write such beatiful straightforward code: public int Delta { get; private set;

  • 0

I can write such beatiful straightforward code:

 public int Delta { get; private set; }

Now I want to add just one call OnPropertyChanged("Delta");

This is the only way I know how to do that:

public int Delta { get { return _delta; } private set
{
    _delta = value; OnPropertyChanged("Delta"); }
}
private int _delta;

It’s too much extra-code! Why should I introduce field in this case? Can you make this code shorter? I would like to have something like that, but it doesn’t work:

 public int Delta { get; private set { OnPropertyChanged("Delta"); } }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T02:33:37+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:33 am

    No you cannot do this with auto-properties. Auto-properties are meant to be short hand syntax for a property over a field. They have virtually no other capabilities. Any custom code execution requires a full fledged property.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today, I found out that you can write such code in C++ and compile
In Groovy, I can write code such as: assert 1 in [1,2,3] assert foo
So how can I still be able to write beautiful code such as: 'im
I want to write such a code for two matrixes: x=[1 1 1 2
I see in MSDN links such as CompareOrdinal Overloads. How can I write such
How can I write this in such a way that $counter value is 1
Summary A parent can have many children. How do you write a service such
I can write: update my_table set xml = updateXML(xml, '/a/b', '1') where document_id =
Instead of this can i write it in such a way that the definition
I wonder if its normal practice to write such kind of code in wpf

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.