Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 568497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:11:42+00:00 2026-05-13T13:11:42+00:00

I consider to use OAuth for Single Sign-On (SSO) with RESTful services. At first

  • 0

I consider to use OAuth for Single Sign-On (SSO) with RESTful services. At first sight to use OAuth as the de facto standard looked naturally to me. But I must confess that I don’t understand how to use it for SSO. During studying OAuth I discovered more and more criticism of Authorization – so much that I tend to think OAuth has failed.

OAuth is hard to implement.

Usability is poor.

Why Facebook doesn’t implement OAuth today:

  • “OAuth is more complex and less performant than our own native authentication mechanism”
  • “OAuth WRAP looks like it will solve most or all of these problems”
  • Bad performance because of two many requests and long URIs
  • “Library quality is overall pretty poor”

Possibly WRAP, powered by Microsoft, Yahoo and Google, is going to replace OAuth.

What’s going on with OAuth (and WRAP)?

So has OAuth failed? What are the alternatives for SSO – preferably those with wide acceptance or the perspective to become widely used? Would you prefer WRAP?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:11:42+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:11 pm

    OAuth isn’t a SSO solution, it’s a protocol commonly used for delegated API authorization. 3 legged OAuth allows a client requesting access to a protected resource to delegate authorization to the server hosting that resource. Basically, the user doesn’t have to give their credentials to a 3rd party (the client), only to the server hosting the protected resource. OpenID may be a more appropriate solution if you are looking to implement single sign-on. You can also use OpenID OAuth extension which will allow you to combine authentication with authorization via OAuth.

    Work is currently being done on OAuth 2.0. WRAP was developed as a stop-gap solution to address some use cases not covered by the original OAuth 1.0a spec. WRAP will not replace OAuth, rather ideas from WRAP will make their way into OAuth 2.0 where appropriate. A number of the original authors of OAuth, as well as one of the authors of WRAP have written about this here:

    What’s going on with OAuth?

    So no, OAuth hasn’t failed, in fact it’s enjoyed pretty wide adoption. OAuth 1.0 will continue to be implemented by a large number of providers and eventually OAuth 2.0 will be available as well. WRAP is there for people who want to take advantage of the use cases it addresses now.

    With regard to the difficulty of implementing OAuth as a client, why not try it out? The available libraries are of varying quality, but with a decent one you can usually implement an OAuth client in under a day.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider a new deployment of Team Foundation Server 2010, with the first use cases
We currently use activecollab with subversion, but we want to consider using Git or
I consider it bad style to use try: except: for flow control, but I
Consider a standard use of the CRTP , for some expression template mechanism, which
I have a type which I consider use it as struct. It represents single
Consider the following use case 1. User selects a product to purchase on seller's
Please consider the following simple use case: public class Foo { public virtual int
Consider: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my %hash; foreach (1 .. 10) { $hash{$_}
let's consider two views that use the same layout composed of: A left column
Consider the following: package MyApp::CGI; use Moose; use MooseX::NonMoose; use Data::Dumper; extends 'CGI::Application'; BEGIN

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.