Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 815653
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T01:43:07+00:00 2026-05-15T01:43:07+00:00

i don’t understand this little thing: Suppose, we have Condition model class Condition <

  • 0

i don’t understand this little thing:

Suppose, we have “Condition” model

class Condition < ActiveRecord::Base
end

Why Condition.all works ?

Condition.all.each { |p| do_something }

This syntax tells us, that we have “Condition” class-object instanciated somewhere ?

Or is it some convention over configuration case ?

I asking this, because i want to override Condition.all method to return Conditions, sorted by “created_at” field value ?

I don’t need to use sort method in place, i want to insert Conditions to, because in the entire project i need only one sorting

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T01:43:07+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:43 am

    Person.all is just an alias for Person.find(:all) (see the documentation here).

    all, like find, is a class method on ActiveRecord::Base so doesn’t require an instance in order to be called.

    Update

    To override a class method you need to remember the self. prefix. e.g. you can override all like this:

    class Condition < ActiveRecord::Base
      def self.all(*args)
        # overridden implementation here
      end
    end
    

    If you aren’t clear on instance methods vs. class methods read this blog post which is a good summary,

    However, if you just want to specify a default ordering you don’t need to do this. You can just use default_scope:

    class Condition < ActiveRecord::Base
      default_scope :order => 'created_at'
    end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

don't understand: in my controller: @json = User.all.to_gmaps4rails do |user| \Title\: \#{user.email}\ end in
don't know better title for this, but here's my code. I have class user
Don't overthink this - there's a very commonly used term and I ... have
Don't think my virtualhost is working correctly. This is what I have inside of
Don't know if this has been answered before. Have custom routes to users. If
Don't understand, if Data.Map is and [] is. I found this out while wondering
Don't know why but I can't find a solution to this. I have 3
Don't you hate it when you have class Foobar { public: Something& getSomething(int index)
Don't know if this is possible, but I have some code like this: val
Don't quite understand why this copy constructor is not invoked when I build with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.