Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3853696
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T17:30:32+00:00 2026-05-19T17:30:32+00:00

I don’t understand when to use the typeof() operator? In what context is it

  • 0

I don’t understand when to use the typeof() operator? In what context is it good to use it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T17:30:33+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 5:30 pm

    It is like .GetType() except it works on a type name instead of an instance.

    You would use typeof(MyType) if you need to get an instance of System.Type and you know the type at compile time. You don’t need an instance of that type for resolve the description of that type (System.Type).

    Eg if you had an instance you would:

    object o = new MyType();
    Type type = o.GetType()
    

    But you could:

    Type type = typeof(MyType)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Don't quite understand determinism in the context of concurrency and parallelism in Haskell. Some
I don't understand where the extra bits are coming from in this article about
Don't think that I'm mad, I understand how php works! That being said. I
Don't be afraid to use any technical jargon or low-level explanations for things, please.
I don't know: if this works. if it's a good idea. what it is
don't understand: in my controller: @json = User.all.to_gmaps4rails do |user| \Title\: \#{user.email}\ end in
Don't understand, if Data.Map is and [] is. I found this out while wondering
I don't like Jackson. I want to use ajax but with Google Gson. So
Don't ask me why but i can't use this method because I need to
Don't understand why #include <Header.h> is not compiling while #include Header.h is compiling with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.