Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6238585
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T11:14:31+00:00 2026-05-24T11:14:31+00:00

I don’t understand why wcf transport layer security restrict the username/password authentication. Okay, message

  • 0

I don’t understand why wcf transport layer security restrict the username/password authentication.
Okay, message encryption at wcf message security model, occurs at TCP/IP Application layer, i mean it encrypts directly the username/password using algorithms, and decrypt using the certificate key, and if someone sniff packets using man in the middle atack, if it doesn’t have the key to decrypt the user credentials, it fails.
But in what consist the weakness of transport layer security that it restrict the username/password authentication?
Can someone make a man in the middle attack and see user credentials in the message at transport level security?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T11:14:32+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 11:14 am

    It is not WCF restriction. It is more like TCP restriction. TCP Transport security is done either:

    • By SSL stream where certificates are used to establish trusted secured connection
    • By Windows stream where windows security is used to establish trusted secured connection

    User name and password itself doesn’t provide anything to creating these streams. If you need to pass user name and password over connection with transport security you indeed can but you must use TransportWithMessageCredential security mode! You will have transport layer secured with certificate and user name and password in SOAP header.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't understand where the extra bits are coming from in this article about
Don't think that I'm mad, I understand how php works! That being said. I
Don't know why people do not practice AJAX implementation for authentication systems. Is it
don't understand: in my controller: @json = User.all.to_gmaps4rails do |user| \Title\: \#{user.email}\ end in
Don't understand, if Data.Map is and [] is. I found this out while wondering
Don't know much about encryption... Say I'm preparing a SAML request to submit to
Don't quite understand determinism in the context of concurrency and parallelism in Haskell. Some
Don't understand why #include <Header.h> is not compiling while #include Header.h is compiling with
Don't you hate it when you have class Foobar { public: Something& getSomething(int index)
Don't let below code scare you away . The question is really simple, only

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.