Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 54287
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:11:47+00:00 2026-05-10T17:11:47+00:00

I find it annoying that I can’t clear a list. In this example: a

  • 0

I find it annoying that I can’t clear a list. In this example:

a = [] a.append(1) a.append(2)  a = [] 

The second time I initialize a to a blank list, it creates a new instance of a list, which is in a different place in memory, so I can’t use it to reference the first, not to mention it’s inefficient.

The only way I can see of retaining the same pointer is doing something like the following:

for i in range(len(a)):     a.pop() 

This seems pretty long-winded though, is there a better way of solving this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:11:48+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:11 pm

    You are looking for:

    del L[:] 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find it sometimes annoying that I have to initialise all POD-types manually. E.g.
I'm trying to use GDB to debug (to find an annoying segfault). When I
I find long sequences of standard includes annoying: #include <vector> #include <string> #include <sstream>
Alright, I find the code below to be quite repetitive and annoying. Any other
I find that getting Unicode support in my cross-platform apps a real pain in
I find that the .NET event model is such that I'll often be raising
I find I can do more with NHibernate, and even Castle than with the
I am working on a jQuery plugin that people can include in their own
I've got 2 problems with Eric4 IDE. Can't find an option in preferences to
How can I cause Firefox to ignore the Content-Disposition: attachment header? I find it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.