Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8440085
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T08:11:19+00:00 2026-06-10T08:11:19+00:00

I find myself doing this a lot: using(var db = new MyDbContext()) { return

  • 0

I find myself doing this a lot:

using(var db = new MyDbContext())
{
  return db.Users.ToList(); // or some other simple query
}

It would be nice to these simple cases as something like:

return MyDbContext.Execute(db => db.Users);

but I’m not sure how I would do the extension method. Ideally (i think) it would take a DbContext (so I could reuse the code) and return the templated IList.. but is this possible?

Of course, if there’s already a method that does this I would love to hear about it..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T08:11:21+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:11 am

    You could write the simplest of static classes for this. You don’t want an extension method, because that requires an instance (and based on the syntax in your example, you don’t yet have one):

    public static class MyDbContextStatic { 
        public static T Execute(Func<MyDbContext, T> f) {
            using (var db = new MyDbContext())
                return f(db);
        }
    }
    

    To use:

    var users = MyDbContextStatic.Execute(db => db.Users);
    

    IIRC, you probably want to call Detach or something on each object before disposing the DbContext as well. But you get the idea.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself doing this repeatedy. $jq(button).filter(function(){ return this.id.match(/^user_(\d+)_edit$/); }).click(function(){ var matches = this.id.match(/^user_(\d+)_edit$/);
I find myself doing the following a lot to define return values from ruby
I find myself using this logic a lot: if (isset($array[$key])) $array[$key] += $num; else
For string functions, I find myself doing this kind of thing a lot: $string
I find myself doing this a lot, for specific properties for animation purposes, and
I find myself doing this a lot: window.onload = function(){ $.get(http://example.com/example.html, function(data) { $('#contentHere').html(data);
I am developing a program where I find myself doing this like this a
I find myself doing the following a lot, and i don't know if there
I find myself using Resharper's convert to auto property refactoring a lot to remove
I find myself using this method a ton to perform actions based on a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.