Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3277892
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:25:14+00:00 2026-05-17T19:25:14+00:00

I find myself doing this a lot: window.onload = function(){ $.get(http://example.com/example.html, function(data) { $(‘#contentHere’).html(data);

  • 0

I find myself doing this a lot:

window.onload = function(){

   $.get("http://example.com/example.html", function(data) {
       $('#contentHere').html(data);

       setTimeout("javaScriptClass.init()", 200);
   });

}

But setTimeout seems a bit hacky (and 200ms is already over three times the attention span of the average user :). What’s the best alternative?

EDIT

javaScriptClass.init() acts on DOM objects from what is loaded in the ajax call

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:25:14+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:25 pm

    I think there’s some confusion here about the load, you can just do this:

    window.onload = function(){    
       $.get("http://example.com/example.html", function(data) {
           $('#contentHere').html(data);
           javaScriptClass.init();
       });    
    }
    

    After the $('#contentHere').html(data); the DOM elements will be there ready to use. Also take a look at .load() for attachment (in case other onload handlers may need to attach), like this:

    $(window).load(function(){    
       $.get("http://example.com/example.html", function(data) {
           $('#contentHere').html(data);
           javaScriptClass.init();
       });    
    });
    

    Though, unless you’re waiting on images, this can be called in a document.ready handler and fire sooner, resulting in a better user experience.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself doing this a lot, for specific properties for animation purposes, and
I find myself doing the following a lot: C:\Code>hg pull pulling from http://server/FogBugz/kiln/Repo/Project/Rebuild/trunk searching
I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I am developing a program where I find myself doing this like this a
So, My app uses a ton of AJAX, and I find myself doing this
I find myself doing the following a lot, and i don't know if there
Ok, I find myself doing this often. I'll attach ids to my tables and
I find myself doing things like this all the time: Button button1 = (Button)
I find myself doing the following a lot to define return values from ruby
I find myself using the Application class a lot to persist user data. These

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.