Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 928933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T20:05:21+00:00 2026-05-15T20:05:21+00:00

I find myself in a quandry that I think I know the solution to

  • 0

I find myself in a quandry that I think I know the solution to but I’d like to ask the field. I have an ASP.NET (C# 2.0 framework) page within a site which is used as a lookup. Standard gridview control, 5 columns of data, hyperlink for the 6th column to do something with record the user wants to select.

My question goes towards how to best display ‘a possible’ 100k records in that gridview? As it stands right now I’d sprout a few more gray hairs before it ever returns a rendered result. The gridview, for its realestate can display about 20 rows of data on the screen at a time, so paging the data still gives me 5000 pages. Adding in a rolodex-type search on A-Z the largest return set on ‘J’ gives me 35000 records (where alas ‘X’ only has 54).

Do I just break the rolodex up smaller or is there a better way to handle a situation like this?

thanks in advance!

edit: I already have the stored procedure which populates this set up for paging like GenericTypeTea suggested, again even with paging on ‘J’ that would give me 1750 pages. The reason I have that much data is that the amount of participants on the given auto policy. The admin needs to be able to search for a given name, or a partial. ‘Jones’ has 1209 records and ‘Smith’ has 2918 so even that makes for a rebust result set.

edit #2: added ‘a possible’ 100k, there is no guarentee that the account will have that many records, on the other hand it could have more 🙁

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T20:05:22+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 8:05 pm

    AutoComplete is your friend 🙂

    Just let people enter the first 2 or 3 characters then filter your searches.

    With a dataset that large I don’t think paging would make that much sense.

    jQuery has a nice example page AutoComplete Examples

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself writing code that looks something like this: $(document).ready(function(){ updateStuff(); $('select').change(function(){ updateStuff();
I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I find myself in a bit of a quandry. I have a large application
I find myself doing the following often enough that I feel like there must
I find myself creating Converters often and would like to be able to: right-click
I find myself adding debugging print statements quite often -- stuff like this: print(a_variable_name:
I find myself writing code like this when I want to repeat some execution
I find myself in a lot of situations where I have a dictionary value
I find myself writing code like the following: val b = a map (entry
I find myself writing a lot of code like putStr foo (bar 1) (bar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.