Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6074475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T10:23:09+00:00 2026-05-23T10:23:09+00:00

I find myself writing code like the following: val b = a map (entry

  • 0

I find myself writing code like the following:

val b = a map (entry =>
    entry match {
        case ((x,y), u) => ((y,x), u)
    }
)

I would like to write it differently, if only this worked:

val c = a map (((x,y) -> u) =>
    (y,x) -> u
)

Is there any way I can get something close to this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T10:23:09+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 10:23 am

    Believe it or not, this works:

    val b = List(1, 2)
    b map {
      case 1 => "one"
      case 2 => "two"
    }
    

    You can skip the p => p match in simple cases. So this should work:

    val c = a map {
      case ((x,y) -> u) => (y,x) -> u
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself writing code like the following quite a lot: if (myEntity.Id ==
I frequently find myself writing code like this: List<int> list = new List<int> {
I always find myself writing code like this: my $var = $result[0]; my $var_changed
I constantly find myself writing similar code like the example below: if (object[Object Name]
I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I find myself writing code like this when I want to repeat some execution
I sometimes find myself writing code like this: someFunc :: Foo -> Int someFunc
Often I find myself writing code like this: if (Session != null) { Session.KillAllProcesses();
Recently, I find myself writing code like this: for name in dir( object ):
I find myself writing a lot of code in my views that looks like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.