Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8108611
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T01:10:03+00:00 2026-06-06T01:10:03+00:00

I found a way to write the if statement in another way (I think)

  • 0

I found a way to write the if statement in another way (I think) while searching in the source code of a website.

Instead of:

if(a)b;

or:

a?b:'';

I read:

!a||b;

Is the third way the same as the first two? And if yes, why we would use the third way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T01:10:04+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 1:10 am

    The third way is the same as the previous ones. One argument to use it is saving bytes. A strong argument against using it is readability. You’d better focus on readability in writing code, and use a minimizer (such as Google Closure Compiler) to save bytes.

    It can be even shorter:

    a && b;
    /*  !a||b  means:
     (not a) OR b
        which is equivalent to
     a AND b
        which turns out to be
     a && b
    */
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I found a way to write avi from BMP files: http://www.delphi3000.com/articles/article_2770.asp?SK= I want to
I am a C# beginner. I found there are 2 way to write codes
I've finally found a way to debug classic asp code in visual studio 2008
So, while working my way through Scala for the Impatient I found myself wondering:
I've found three ways to write the same condition in Ruby: #1 if 1==1
I've been searching for a while now for a way to execute a select
I found many way for redirect to previous page after login and example :
I have found the way to copy the record that I would like, but
okay i have found the way to run a video in a image.... the
I have not found any way to successfully set a screen resolution on my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.