Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6796439
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T18:29:23+00:00 2026-05-26T18:29:23+00:00

I found how to compile the current buffer in vim with make: set makeprg=g++\

  • 0

I found how to compile the current buffer in vim with make:

set makeprg=g++\ -o\ %<\ %

I know that % means “current buffer” but I am wondering what less than sign (<) means?

Also, in this link http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Make-compile_current_buffer mentions that %< is deprecated. Is there another way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T18:29:23+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:29 pm

    “%<” is expanded to the name of the current buffer without the extension. See :help _%<.
    So, when you are currently editing myfile.c, your makeprg setting is expanded to g++ -o myfile myfile.c, which will compile myfile.c into the executable myfile.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

EDIT: I found out that I can get it to compile if I cast
Today, I found out that you can write such code in C++ and compile
I know there are plenty of questions regarding this error, but I haven't found
I'm current working on a C++ that I edit locally on my Mac but
I've installed Emacs 23 and have found that the compilation buffer (when using M-x
I just found my code like this does not compile right? Is there any
I keep getting the error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time
I found only one attempt to create such compiler - http://sourceforge.net/projects/xsltc/ . But this
When I compiled my application in release mode, I found that the Log4Net still
I understand that the C# keyword var implies the type at compile time and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.