Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 955805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:26:37+00:00 2026-05-16T00:26:37+00:00

I have a asynchronous task like so: dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{ myAsyncMethodsHere; }); Is there a

  • 0

I have a asynchronous task like so:

dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
     myAsyncMethodsHere;
});

Is there a way to be notified when the background task is complete?

Or to call a method upon completion?

I’ve read through the documentation and have looked into dispatch_after, but it seems to be more designed to dispatch the method after a certain length of time.

Thanks for the help.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:26:38+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:26 am

    From the docs:

    COMPLETION CALLBACKS

    Completion callbacks can be accomplished via nested calls to the dispatch_async() function. It is
    important to remember to retain the destination queue before the first call to dispatch_async(), and to release that queue at the end of the completion callback to ensure the destination queue is not deallocated while the completion callback is pending. For example:

     void
     async_read(object_t obj,
             void *where, size_t bytes,
             dispatch_queue_t destination_queue,
             void (^reply_block)(ssize_t r, int err))
     {
             // There are better ways of doing async I/O.
             // This is just an example of nested blocks.
    
             dispatch_retain(destination_queue);
    
             dispatch_async(obj->queue, ^{
                     ssize_t r = read(obj->fd, where, bytes);
                     int err = errno;
    
                     dispatch_async(destination_queue, ^{
                             reply_block(r, err);
                     });
                     dispatch_release(destination_queue);
             });
     }
    

    Source

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have method that does asynchronous call to web service. Something like that: public
I have created an asynchronous task like this: private class LongOperationcheckall extends AsyncTask<String, String,
I have lot of code in my Tornado app which looks like this: @tornado.web.asynchronous
I'm currently working on a project and I'd like to integrate asynchronous task processing
I have a method that queues some work to be executed asynchronously. I'd like
I have a basic asynchronous task that performs a web request. The thread is
What is the preferred way to create a background task for a Rails application?
Was wondering what the best way to handle an expensive web task? I have
I have service object (Service A), that has some specific repetitive asynchronous task .
We have an asynchronous task that performs a potentially long-running calculation for an object.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.