Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3966892
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T03:39:20+00:00 2026-05-20T03:39:20+00:00

I have a bad feeling that the answer is no, but is the checkin

  • 0

I have a bad feeling that the answer is no, but is the checkin command of ClearCase Remote Client in single-command mode in anyway atomic?

For example, I have three files A, B, and C. I make changes to each file and perform a checkin. A checks in, B checks in, but C gets a merge conflict. In that case, what happens? Will the checkin for all files fail, or will it fail for only C (in which case, the repo is in a broken state).

If it is the latter, is there a way to make it atomic using just rcleartool?

Any help would be appreciated!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T03:39:20+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 3:39 am

    I haven’t tested it yet, but not that:

    1. atomic checkin needs to be enabled on the target Vob in which you want to perform atomic checkins.
    2. It is only for base ClearCase
    3. You need 7.1.2 (otherwise you will have an error for most of the object type when doing multiple files checkins)
    4. No other (read/write) operations on the Vobs are possible during an atomic checkin.
      (which makes me think that rcleartool shouldn’t be able to perform — over WAN — an atomic checkin: it would block a Vob for way too much time).

    The latest (7.1.2) description of Checkin does mention:

    Select this option (which is also known as atomic checkin) to specify that the checkin operation takes place in a single, bulk transaction. If any of the resources being checked in fails for any reason, the entire checkin operation fails.
    When you select this option, the Checkin even if the version is identical to its predecessor option is automatically selected since an identical file would cause the entire checkin to fail.

    So in case of a merge conflict, it will abort the all transaction.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a bad feeling that the answer to this question is no, but
I have a very bad feeling about using lock in my code but now
I have the feeling that I'm missing the obvious, but have not succeeded with
i hat one task, and know i have to continue but have a bad
I have the string: i am a bad boy. I want to convert that
My feeling says it's not posible but anyway I am curious if there is
I have a table that must reference another record, but of the same table.
I have a general gut feeling about the difference but I'm unable to pinpoint
I need help getting git extensions to run with msysgit. I have had bad
Unfortunately I have a pretty bad understanding of how to properly set up threading.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.