Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6221757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:11:23+00:00 2026-05-24T08:11:23+00:00

I have a class which focuses on database operations (e.g. write/read etc). Is there

  • 0

I have a class which focuses on database operations (e.g. write/read etc). Is there an elegant way to pass in the same SqlConnection to each methoid as opposed to making a new object as a local variable in each parameter?

I remember seeing an example of this, on this site, using a lambda expression. That was ideal but can’t find it.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:11:24+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:11 am

    IMHO, it is an absolutely bad idea to pass a SqlConnection object between classes.

    It is much much better to simply create a new connection object just before usage. In other words, within each method that makes a database call. SqlConnection is an IDisposable class that deals with unmanaged resources. If something get’s hosed then you run the possibility of leaking connections.

    Also, creating and disposing of those connection objects is an extremely fast operation due to connection pooling that is handled at a much lower layer than your code. Which means the only benefit you get by passing it in is 1 less line of code per method that performs data access; while the downside is a potential inability to perform any additional sql calls without shutting down your application. If this is a web app, then this it’s a completely horrible decision as it would potentially shut down the entire site.

    That said, passing the connection string around is okay, although this is something that typically is loaded through your config file.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class which does operations on the database, but I want to
I have class which have one public method Start , one private method and
I have class Money which is an @Embeddable @Embeddable public class Money implements Serializable,
I have class A which extends the Activity class. This class is in package
I have class World which manages creation of object... After creation it calls afterCreation
I have class Employee which is something like this. class Emp { int EmpID;
I have a class which is called a number of times. When the application
I have a class which is derived from a base class, and have many
I have a class which contains a static collection that can be used across
I have a class which is basically a copy of another class. public class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.