Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8525757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T08:04:36+00:00 2026-06-11T08:04:36+00:00

I have a class which I think makes more sense to make static, as

  • 0

I have a class which I think makes more sense to make static, as it is basically a utility class. As a part of this class, I am interoping with Microsoft Access and Microsoft Excel.

Obviously, Office Interop objects are unmanaged resources, and a static class cannot have a destructor. I feel that it make sense to only have one instance of an Excel.Application object, and one instance of an Access.Application object that my various methods can make use of, taking care to close my databases and workbooks, and handle errors appropriately.

My issue comes when I close the program, if I don’t run System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject("myOfficeApplicationInstance");, the Office instances hang around in my task manager. If I release the object while my application is running, then I can’t use it again.

I’m not sure if that all made sense so some code is below:

using System;
using Excel = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application;
using Access = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Access.Application;

namespace QWERTY
{
    internal static class CreateReport
    {
        private static readonly Excel _excel;
        private static readonly Access _access;

        static CreateReport()
        {
            _excel = new Excel();
            _access = new Access();
        }

        internal static void Performance(DateTime reportDate)
        {
            _excel.Workbooks.Open(@"C:\whatever.xlsx");

            //Do stuff with Excel

            _excel.Workbooks.Close();

            _access.OpenCurrentDatabase(@"C:\whatever.accdb");

            //Do stuff with Access

            _access.CloseCurrentDatabase();
        }
    }
}

A few questions

  1. Am I right that this should be a static class?
  2. How do I deal with unmanaged resources when I am finished using a static class?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T08:04:37+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:04 am

    There are no static finalizers (see here). If you want to make the class static, also add a method to clean up which you call at the end of you application.

    An alternative (which I would prefer) is to have a singleton instance, and clean up this instance at the end of your application.

    You can also then have a static property to access the instance if you want to. An alternative to the static property is to use some form of DI which you configure to create a single instance. Most DI’s offer singleton scopes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have class A which extends the Activity class. This class is in package
I have class Employee which is something like this. class Emp { int EmpID;
For a large project, would it make sense to have one datacontext which maps
I have a class which makes requests to a remote API. I'd like to
I have class which have one public method Start , one private method and
I have class LegacyClass which inherits OldBaseClass. I'm considering a change to introduce a
I have class Money which is an @Embeddable @Embeddable public class Money implements Serializable,
I have class World which manages creation of object... After creation it calls afterCreation
I have a class which is in charge for error handling. I would like
I have a class which represents exam,it can start/reset/pause exam, so the methods look

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.