Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9086675
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T21:32:46+00:00 2026-06-16T21:32:46+00:00

I have a class whose constructor might throw an exception. class A { A()

  • 0

I have a class whose constructor might throw an exception.

class A {
    A() { /* throw exception under certain circumstances */ }
};

I would like to catch this exception in the client for a stack-allocated instance. But I find myself forced to extend the try block at least as far as the instance must be alive.

try {
    A a;
    do_something(a);
} catch {
    // ...
}

Now this obviously becomes a problem when the try block is too large to track down the source of the exception:

try {
    A a1;
    A a2;
    do_something(a1, a2);
} catch {
    // Who caused the exception?
}

What would I do to avoid the situation?

UPDATE:

It seems I hadn’t explained the problem very well: For obvious reasons, I want to have the try block spanning as little code as necessary (that is, only the construction).

But that creates the problem that I can’t use the objects afterwards because they have moved out of scope.

try {
    A a1;
} catch {
    // handle a1 constructor exception
}
try {
    A a2;
} catch {
    // handle a2 constructor exception
}

// not possible
do_something(a1, a2);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T21:32:48+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 9:32 pm

    A solution that doesn’t require changing A is to use nested try/catch blocks:

    try {
        A a1;
        try {
            A a2;
            do_something(a1, a2);
        }
        catch {
          // a2 (or do_something) threw
        }
    } catch {
        // a1 threw
    }
    

    Probably better to avoid doing this if possible though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class Graph whose copy constructor is declared in Graph.h like this:
I have a class whose constructor takes a const reference to a string. This
I have an attribute whose constructor takes two strings. I would like to make
We have a class whose semantic behaviour is like the following :- struct Sample
I have a class whose functionality I'd like to depend on a set of
I have a class whose methods require that a certain class field exists correctly.
I have an array whose indices map back to Enum values. I would like
I have a class whose constructor is defined as internal, which means I cannot
I have a managed C++ class, with a method whose constructor signature is: tools_package_net::PackageInfo::PackageInfo(array<Byte>^
I have codeigniter model like this <?php class Model_Login extends CI_Model{ function __construct(){ parent::__construct();

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.